Palo Alto Networks PSE-StrataDC Exam - Topic 6 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-StrataDC exam

Question #: 68
Topic #: 6

A customer wants to completely segment their internal networks They have Cisco switches and extensively use 10Gbps interfaces. They are running VMware ESXi and are considering implementing NSX. Which three Palo Alto Networks firewall models will support this deployment? (Choose three.)

APA-3050

BVM-100

CVM-300

DPA-3250

EPA-7050

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Micaela at Sep 07, 2024, 08:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-StrataDC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shannan

8 months ago

PA-300 is a good fit too, don’t overlook it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

9 months ago

PA-3050 is outdated, not sure it fits here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernell

9 months ago

Wait, is the VM-100 really suitable for this setup?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammara

9 months ago

Definitely agree, those models are powerful!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

9 months ago

I think PA-3250 and PA-7050 are solid choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elliot

9 months ago

I feel confident about the PA-7050 and PA-3250, but I’m uncertain if the VM-100 fits into this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jarvis

10 months ago

The PA-3250 sounds familiar, but I might be mixing it up with another model. I need to double-check my notes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latrice

10 months ago

I remember studying the VM-300 and VM-100, but I can't recall if they support the same throughput as the physical models.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leeann

10 months ago

I think the PA-7050 is definitely one of the models that can handle 10Gbps interfaces, but I'm not sure about the others.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

10 months ago

This is a great opportunity to showcase my knowledge of Palo Alto Networks solutions. I'll carefully consider the requirements and select the appropriate firewall models.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maynard

10 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to review the Palo Alto Networks product line and their capabilities to make sure I select the right three models.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chana

10 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The key is identifying the Palo Alto Networks models that can handle the high-speed interfaces and integration with VMware ESXi.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggie

10 months ago

Okay, let's see. The question is asking for three Palo Alto Networks firewall models that will support this deployment. I think I can narrow it down based on the details provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

10 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around the Cisco switches, 10Gbps interfaces, and VMware ESXi.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnna

10 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. The Create WBS process is all about taking the high-level project scope and decomposing it into a detailed work breakdown structure. So the required input has to be the project scope statement, which lays out the overall project boundaries and deliverables. I'm selecting option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

1 year ago

I'd go with the PA-3050, PA-3250, and VM-300. The virtual model will play nicely with the VMware environment, and the PA models will handle the 10Gbps interfaces like a champ. Just don't forget to set the firewall models to 'Turbo' mode for maximum speed!

upvoted 0 times

Britt

1 year ago

Make sure to configure the Palo Alto Networks firewall models properly for optimal performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolando

1 year ago

Setting the firewall models to 'Turbo' mode will definitely maximize speed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isabelle

1 year ago

PA-3050, PA-3250, and VM-300 are great choices for this setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilberto

1 year ago

The PA-3050 and PA-3250 seem like the obvious choices here. The VM-100 and VM-300 are probably a bit too lightweight for this kind of deployment. And the PA-7050? That's like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight!

upvoted 0 times

Beth

1 year ago

Definitely, the PA-7050 seems like overkill for this deployment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cory

1 year ago

Yeah, the VM-100 and VM-300 might not have enough power for 10Gbps interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

1 year ago

I agree, the PA-3050 and PA-3250 are solid choices for this setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

1 year ago

Hmm, I wonder if the PA-3050 and PA-3250 can handle the throughput required for 10Gbps interfaces. The VM-300 might be a better choice in that case. And of course, the PA-7050 is always an option if you want to go big!

upvoted 0 times

Belen

1 year ago

Definitely, the PA-7050 is a great option for high performance. It's always good to have options!

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelle

1 year ago

Yeah, the VM-300 might be a better choice for that. And don't forget about the PA-7050 if you want to go big!

upvoted 0 times

...

An

1 year ago

I think the PA-3050 and PA-3250 should be able to handle the throughput for 10Gbps interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

1 year ago

I'm not sure about the VM-100 and VM-300, as they're virtual models. The PA-7050 might be overkill for this deployment. I'd probably go with the PA-3050, PA-3250, and one of the virtual models.

upvoted 0 times

Justine

1 year ago

I agree, the PA-7050 might be too much for what they need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

1 year ago

I think the PA-3050 and PA-3250 would be good choices for this deployment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirby

1 year ago

The PA-3050 and PA-3250 seem like good options since they support 10Gbps interfaces. The VM-100 and VM-300 are virtual models, so they could work well with the VMware ESXi environment.

upvoted 0 times