New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-StrataDC Exam - Topic 1 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-StrataDC exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-StrataDC Questions]

When deploying VM series on NSX platform to support micro-segmentation, which statement is NOT correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Abel at Nov 24, 2025, 08:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-StrataDC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rusty
1 day ago
Wait, only one NSX manager per Panorama? That seems limiting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
6 days ago
I think D) is the one that's off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
12 days ago
A) is correct, VM-Series does use NetX API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
17 days ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer was trying to trick us with that last option. Nice try, but I'm not falling for it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
22 days ago
C) VM-Series provide Multi-tenancy support with multiple zones is the correct answer. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
27 days ago
I thought the VM-Series was for virtualized environments, not physical ones. This question is confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
1 month ago
D) One panorama could support to connect with only one NSX manager seems incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
1 month ago
I feel like I’ve seen questions about the NetX API before, but I can't quite recall if it was specifically for packet handling or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
1 month ago
I practiced a similar question where we discussed traffic steering rules. I believe those can indeed be pushed from Panorama to NSX Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
2 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I remember covering this topic in class, so I think I've got a solid handle on it. I'll quickly review the options and then select the one that doesn't align with my understanding of the VM-Series and NSX integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is tricky, and I want to make sure I don't miss any nuances in how the VM-Series and NSX work together. I'll need to review my notes and maybe even look up some additional information to feel confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
2 months ago
Alright, this looks like it's testing our knowledge of the VM-Series and NSX integration. I'm pretty confident I can eliminate a couple of these options, but I'll need to double-check my understanding to be sure I've got the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
2 months ago
I remember studying the VM-Series capabilities, but I'm not sure about the multi-tenancy support. Does it really have multiple zones?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
2 months ago
Agreed, D seems off. It limits scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 months ago
I think D is the wrong statement. One Panorama can connect to multiple NSX managers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
3 months ago
B) Traffic steering rules could be defined on Panorama and pushed to NSX Manager makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
3 months ago
I think option D sounds off. I vaguely recall something about Panorama being able to connect to multiple NSX managers in some scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
3 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I think the key is understanding how the VM-Series integrates with the NSX platform, especially around traffic steering and multi-tenancy support. I'll need to make sure I have a good grasp of those concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the key differences between the VM-Series and NSX platform.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel