New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks PSE-StrataDC Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-StrataDC exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-StrataDC Questions]

How do Palo Alto Networks NGFWs integrate with an ACI architecture?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Maia
4 months ago
Wait, can firewalls really be programmed like that? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
4 months ago
B is a bit outdated, isn't it? Static objects aren't always the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
4 months ago
A is interesting, but does it really work as intended?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
4 months ago
C sounds right, but I'm not sure about the VXLAN part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
4 months ago
I think D is spot on! REST APIs are super useful for integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
I’m not confident about the static Address objects for redirecting traffic; it seems a bit off compared to what we practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because integrating with ACI seems like it would involve some kind of API, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
5 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question about VXLAN traffic before, but I can't recall if it was about termination or just inspection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
5 months ago
I think I remember something about how controllers can program firewalls, but I'm not entirely sure if it's specifically REST-based APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
5 months ago
I'm not too sure about this one. All the options seem like they could work, but I'm not sure which one is the "minimize development effort" solution they're looking for. I might need to do some quick research on the different speech integration options before I decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going to take my time and methodically go through the options. I'm confident I can figure out the right answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd start by prioritizing the responses based on likelihood and impact to address the most critical security gaps first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
5 months ago
I think the answer might be "agnostic," but I'm not entirely sure if it fits with the idea of reusability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure how to get the CPU usage for each pod. I'll need to look up the right command to do that.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel