I feel like I read that Palo Alto doesn't natively support VXLAN tagging, but that network equipment can help convert flows. I think that might be option D.
If I recall correctly, there was something about VMware and VXLAN integration with Palo Alto, but I can't remember if it was full integration or just partial.
I'm a little confused by this question. I know Cisco UCS and VMware vSphere are related, but I'm not sure how to connect the dots here. I'll have to review my notes on Cisco UCS and VMware compatibility to figure out the best approach.
A) does not integrate with VXLAN tagging, so virtual appliances cannot be provided, but hardware appliances can be offered at the data center gateway border
D) does not integrate natively with VXLAN tagging, network equipment can convert VXLAN flows to VLANs and send those VLANs to Palo Alto Networks firewalls
D sounds like a workaround, but I'm not a fan of relying on network equipment to do the conversion. Seems like an unnecessary step that could introduce complexity.
D) does not integrate natively with VXLAN tagging, network equipment can convert VXLAN flows to VLANs and send those VLANs to Palo Alto Networks firewalls
A) does not integrate with VXLAN tagging, so virtual appliances cannot be provided, but hardware appliances can be offered at the data center gateway border
D) does not integrate natively with VXLAN tagging, network equipment can convert VXLAN flows to VLANs and send those VLANs to Palo Alto Networks firewalls
A) does not integrate with VXLAN tagging, so virtual appliances cannot be provided, but hardware appliances can be offered at the data center gateway border
I heard that Palo Alto Networks does not integrate natively with VXLAN tagging, but network equipment can convert VXLAN flows to VLANs and send those VLANs to Palo Alto Networks firewalls.
I believe that Palo Alto Networks does not integrate with VXLAN tagging, so virtual appliances cannot be provided, but hardware appliances can be offered at the data center gateway border.
Option C looks the most promising, but I'm not sure about the 'if they are provided by VMware' part. Shouldn't Palo Alto integrate natively regardless of the VXLAN provider?
Kizzy
4 months agoPeggy
4 months agoBroderick
4 months agoGracie
4 months agoDiego
4 months agoTrinidad
5 months agoElke
5 months agoTy
5 months agoPercy
5 months agoHoward
5 months agoEllsworth
5 months agoClorinda
5 months agoEarnestine
10 months agoLawana
8 months agoLouvenia
8 months agoLaticia
8 months agoArletta
10 months agoFloyd
9 months agoOtis
9 months agoLasandra
10 months agoScarlet
10 months agoTheron
8 months agoBrock
8 months agoCatalina
8 months agoKarrie
8 months agoYolando
9 months agoRegenia
9 months agoJerry
9 months agoNana
10 months agoJesse
10 months agoSabina
9 months agoMarsha
9 months agoRodrigo
10 months agoShawnta
11 months agoFrancisca
11 months agoMyra
11 months ago