New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 6 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 6
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

XYZ Corporation has a legacy environment with asymmetric routing. The customer understands that Palo Alto Networks firewalls can support asymmetric routing with redundancy. Which two features must be enabled to meet the customer's requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Silva
2 months ago
Wow, I didn't know they could handle asymmetric routing like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
2 months ago
I think HA active/active is also a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
3 months ago
Virtual systems are important too, don't forget!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
3 months ago
Not sure about that, isn't HA active/passive more common?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
3 months ago
Definitely need Policy-based forwarding for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
3 months ago
Virtual systems seem like they could be useful, but I don't remember if they are necessary for asymmetric routing specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where HA modes were discussed, and I feel like active/passive might also be relevant here, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
4 months ago
I think HA active/active is definitely a requirement for redundancy, but I can't recall if we need to enable anything else alongside it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
4 months ago
I remember something about policy-based forwarding being important for handling asymmetric routing, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the only feature needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
4 months ago
Hmm, good point Mike. I'm leaning towards policy-based forwarding and HA active/active, but I'll double-check the details on virtual systems just to be sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
4 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Isn't virtual systems also a feature that can help with redundancy? I'm not sure if that's the right answer or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
5 months ago
Okay, let's see... Policy-based forwarding and HA active/active seem like the most relevant options here. I'm pretty confident those are the two features we need to enable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like it's testing our knowledge of Palo Alto Networks firewalls and asymmetric routing. I think I'll start by considering the key requirements - redundancy and support for asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
8 months ago
Ugh, why do these firewall questions always have to be so complicated? Can't they just make them multiple choice like normal people? *rolls eyes*
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
8 months ago
Whoa, hold up! What about option A? I heard virtual systems can actually help with asymmetric routing too. But B and D are probably the best combo.
upvoted 0 times
Zona
7 months ago
Marcos: Makes sense, HA active/active and policy-based forwarding it is then!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
7 months ago
User 3: I agree, HA active/active and policy-based forwarding are the way to go for supporting asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
7 months ago
User 2: Yeah, virtual systems are important, but I believe HA active/active and policy-based forwarding are the best combo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
8 months ago
User 1: I think virtual systems can definitely help with asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bulah
9 months ago
I think D) Policy-based forwarding could also be a potential answer, as it can help with routing in asymmetric environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
9 months ago
I'm not sure about the answer. I think C) HA active/passive could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
9 months ago
Haha, active/active HA? What is this, the 90s? Anyway, I agree with Hayley and Charlesetta, B and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Gussie
8 months ago
Yeah, active/active HA is a bit outdated. HA active/active and policy-based forwarding should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
8 months ago
I think virtual systems and policy-based forwarding are the key features to enable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlesetta
9 months ago
Definitely B and D. I mean, who even uses active/active HA these days? That's so last decade.
upvoted 0 times
Jody
8 months ago
Agreed, active/passive HA and policy-based forwarding are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
8 months ago
Definitely, those two options will meet the customer's requirements perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
9 months ago
Yeah, I agree. And policy-based forwarding is a must-have feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
9 months ago
I think HA active/passive is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
9 months ago
I agree with Leslie. Virtual systems and HA active/active make sense for supporting asymmetric routing with redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
10 months ago
I think the answer is A) Virtual systems and B) HA active/active.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
10 months ago
I think the correct answers are option B and option D. Virtual systems and active/passive HA don't really seem relevant to handling asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
Cora
9 months ago
Enabling HA active/active and Policy-based forwarding should do the trick for XYZ Corporation's legacy environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
9 months ago
Virtual systems and active/passive HA wouldn't really help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
9 months ago
I agree, option B and option D are the correct answers for handling asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel