Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Strata Topic 5 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 5
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

What is the recommended way to ensure that firewalls have the most current set of signatures for up-to-date protection?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Dorsey at Sep 18, 2024, 06:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Leontine
7 months ago
But wouldn't storing updates on an intermediary server and pointing all firewalls to it be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
7 months ago
Haha, a Perl script? What is this, the 90s? D is clearly the most efficient choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
7 months ago
D, hands down. I ain't got time to be running Perl scripts or checking for updates myself. Let the firewall do its thing!
upvoted 0 times
Albert
5 months ago
True, but manual pushing updates to Crewall sounds like a lot of work. Dynamic updates seem more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
5 months ago
I think storing updates on an intermediary server and pointing all firewalls to it could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
5 months ago
Agreed, dynamic updates with an aggressive schedule is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
6 months ago
D, hands down. I ain't got time to be running Perl scripts or checking for updates myself. Let the firewall do its thing!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Titus
7 months ago
I agree with Tanesha, it ensures the firewalls have the most current set of signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
7 months ago
B is the way to go. I trust my team to stay on top of the latest updates and push them out when needed.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
6 months ago
Storing updates on an intermediary server could also work, as long as it is regularly updated with the latest signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
6 months ago
I think using dynamic updates would be more efficient in ensuring that the firewalls have the most current set of signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
7 months ago
I agree, manual updates give us more control over when the updates are pushed out.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tanesha
7 months ago
I think the recommended way is to use dynamic updates with an aggressive schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
7 months ago
I'll have to go with C. An intermediary server just makes sense for managing updates across multiple firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
Helga
6 months ago
I prefer monitoring update announcements and manually pushing updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
6 months ago
Running a Perl script to check for updates sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
7 months ago
I think using dynamic updates with an aggressive schedule is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
7 months ago
I agree, having a central server for updates is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bulah
7 months ago
Definitely D. Automatic updates are the way to go. Who has time to manually check for updates these days?
upvoted 0 times
Doretha
7 months ago
I think D is the best choice too. It saves time and ensures the firewalls are always up-to-date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
7 months ago
Agreed, D is definitely the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel