New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 4 Question 112 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 112
Topic #: 4
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

Which is the smallest Panorama solution that can be used to manage up to 2500 Palo Alto Networks Next Generation firewalls?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Merilyn at Aug 01, 2025, 05:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sherita
2 months ago
M-200 is the answer, but I’m surprised it can manage that many!
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
2 months ago
Wait, can the M-100 really handle that many? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 months ago
Definitely M-200, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
3 months ago
I thought the M-600 was the minimum for 2500 firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
3 months ago
I think it's the M-200 for that many firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
3 months ago
The Panorama VM-Series sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it's the smallest solution for that many devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards the M-100, but I’m worried it might not support 2500 firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about Panorama solutions, and I feel like the M-600 was mentioned as a larger option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
4 months ago
I think the M-200 is the right choice, but I’m not completely sure if it can handle that many firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
4 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm going to need to review the Panorama documentation to make sure I understand the capabilities of each option. Gotta love these vendor-specific questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
4 months ago
I've worked with Panorama before, so I think I've got a good handle on this. The M-600 is the largest hardware-based solution, so that's likely the answer. But I'll double-check the specs just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between the hardware-based Panorama solutions and the VM-Series. I'll need to do some quick research to understand the pros and cons of each before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The M-200, M-600, and M-100 are all hardware-based Panorama solutions, so I'll need to check the specs on each one to see which can support the largest number of firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward question about Panorama solutions. I'll need to think through the capabilities of each option to determine the smallest one that can handle 2500 firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
5 months ago
I'm going with the Panorama VM-Series. It's more scalable and flexible than the hardware options. Plus, I heard it comes with a complimentary magic wand to make all your firewall problems disappear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
5 months ago
I agree with Irma, the Panorama VM-Series is a virtual solution that can handle a large number of firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the smaller the solution, the more limited its capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
7 months ago
The M-600 seems like the obvious choice here. I mean, it's the biggest one, so it must be able to handle the most firewalls, right?
upvoted 0 times
Vanda
5 months ago
I think the M-600 is actually too big for managing up to 2500 firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irma
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Panorama VM-Series.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
7 months ago
I think the answer is C) M-100.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel