U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 3 Question 115 Discussion

An SE is preparing an SLR report for a school and wants to emphasize URL filtering capabilities because the school is concerned that its students are accessing inappropriate websites. The URL categories being chosen by default in the report are not highlighting these types of websites. How should the SE show the customer the firewall can detect that these websites are being accessed?
C) Remove unwanted categories listed under 'High Risk' and use relevant information
A) Create a footnote within the SLR generation tool
B) Edit the Key-Findings text to list the other types of categories that may be of interest
D) Produce the report and edit the PDF manually

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 3 Question 115 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 115
Topic #: 3
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

An SE is preparing an SLR report for a school and wants to emphasize URL filtering capabilities because the school is concerned that its students are accessing inappropriate websites. The URL categories being chosen by default in the report are not highlighting these types of websites. How should the SE show the customer the firewall can detect that these websites are being accessed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tamra at Nov 25, 2025, 09:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rozella
2 months ago
C is good for clarity, but we need to highlight the risks effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
2 months ago
I like B too. Listing relevant categories shows we understand their needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 months ago
D is too much work. Manual edits can lead to errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 months ago
Option A seems too passive. A footnote won't really show the capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
2 months ago
I agree, but option C could also work. Removing irrelevant categories makes it clearer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
3 months ago
Agreed, we need to focus on the important stuff!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
3 months ago
Removing unwanted categories sounds like a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
3 months ago
Wait, can the firewall really detect all those sites?
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
3 months ago
I think editing the Key-Findings text is the best move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
3 months ago
Just highlight the relevant categories in the report!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
4 months ago
Editing the PDF manually? That's like trying to put toothpaste back in the tube! Option B is the way to go, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
4 months ago
Hmm, I'd say C is the way to go. Removing the irrelevant categories is the best way to get the point across.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
4 months ago
Option A is a bit too subtle. Gotta make sure the customer can't miss those URL filtering capabilities!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
4 months ago
D, all the way! Editing the PDF manually gives you more control over the final product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
5 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Gotta keep those kids away from the bad stuff!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
5 months ago
I recall that removing unwanted categories could help focus on the relevant data, but I’m not sure if that’s the best approach for this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
5 months ago
I feel like manually editing the PDF could work, but it seems like a lot of extra work when there might be a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
5 months ago
I think editing the Key-Findings text might be the way to go, but I’m not completely confident if that’s enough to show the firewall's capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
5 months ago
I remember we practiced a similar question about customizing reports, but I’m not sure which option best highlights the URL filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
6 months ago
I feel pretty confident that C is the way to go. Removing the irrelevant categories and focusing on the ones that are important to the customer is the most direct and effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
6 months ago
Option B seems like a good compromise. Editing the Key-Findings text to include the relevant categories would be a straightforward way to address the customer's concerns without having to do too much customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about manually editing the PDF. That seems risky and could introduce errors. I'd lean more towards using the SLR generation tool to get the information we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
6 months ago
I think option B is the best. It directly addresses the customer's concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
7 months ago
I'd go with B. Highlighting the relevant categories in the Key-Findings is a nice, clean approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should we be editing the report directly or trying to customize the SLR generation tool? I'm not sure which option is the most appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
7 months ago
I think option C is the best approach here. Removing the unwanted categories and highlighting the relevant ones will really help the customer see the firewall's capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Kris
1 month ago
Good call! Customers need to see the real risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 months ago
Yes, it shows the firewall's effectiveness clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
6 months ago
Removing the unwanted ones will clarify the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
6 months ago
I agree, option C makes the most sense. Focus on what's important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
7 months ago
Definitely! Highlighting relevant categories is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel