New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 3 Question 115 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 115
Topic #: 3
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

An SE is preparing an SLR report for a school and wants to emphasize URL filtering capabilities because the school is concerned that its students are accessing inappropriate websites. The URL categories being chosen by default in the report are not highlighting these types of websites. How should the SE show the customer the firewall can detect that these websites are being accessed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Katheryn
1 day ago
Editing the PDF manually? That's like trying to put toothpaste back in the tube! Option B is the way to go, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
6 days ago
Hmm, I'd say C is the way to go. Removing the irrelevant categories is the best way to get the point across.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
12 days ago
Option A is a bit too subtle. Gotta make sure the customer can't miss those URL filtering capabilities!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
17 days ago
D, all the way! Editing the PDF manually gives you more control over the final product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
22 days ago
Option C is the way to go. Gotta keep those kids away from the bad stuff!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
27 days ago
I recall that removing unwanted categories could help focus on the relevant data, but I’m not sure if that’s the best approach for this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 month ago
I feel like manually editing the PDF could work, but it seems like a lot of extra work when there might be a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
1 month ago
I think editing the Key-Findings text might be the way to go, but I’m not completely confident if that’s enough to show the firewall's capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 month ago
I remember we practiced a similar question about customizing reports, but I’m not sure which option best highlights the URL filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
2 months ago
I feel pretty confident that C is the way to go. Removing the irrelevant categories and focusing on the ones that are important to the customer is the most direct and effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
2 months ago
Option B seems like a good compromise. Editing the Key-Findings text to include the relevant categories would be a straightforward way to address the customer's concerns without having to do too much customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about manually editing the PDF. That seems risky and could introduce errors. I'd lean more towards using the SLR generation tool to get the information we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
2 months ago
I think option B is the best. It directly addresses the customer's concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
3 months ago
I'd go with B. Highlighting the relevant categories in the Key-Findings is a nice, clean approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should we be editing the report directly or trying to customize the SLR generation tool? I'm not sure which option is the most appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
3 months ago
I think option C is the best approach here. Removing the unwanted categories and highlighting the relevant ones will really help the customer see the firewall's capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
2 months ago
Removing the unwanted ones will clarify the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 months ago
I agree, option C makes the most sense. Focus on what's important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
3 months ago
Definitely! Highlighting relevant categories is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel