New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 1 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

A packet that is already associated with a current session arrives at the firewall.

What is the flow of the packet after the firewall determines that it is matched with an existing session?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Kerry at Sep 20, 2022, 05:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dona
4 months ago
Fast path is correct, no session setup needed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
4 months ago
I thought all packets went through multiple engines, not just some.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the content inspection part?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
4 months ago
I agree, fast path makes sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
4 months ago
It's definitely the fast path for existing sessions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because it mentions fast path and session establishment not being required, but I’m not entirely certain about the content inspection engines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about fast path versus slow path. I feel like fast path is the right choice, but the content inspection details are confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
I remember something about the slow path being for packets that need more inspection, but I can't recall if that's the case here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
5 months ago
I think the packet goes through the fast path since it's already associated with a session, but I'm not sure about the content inspection part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Ansible playbooks can have conditional logic, but I'm not 100% sure if that's the exact term used in the question. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to make sure we properly sanitize any user input before passing it to the Apex controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
5 months ago
Okay, I see the issue with the date format. And I'll need to make sure I drop the transactionDate column after creating the new transactionTimestamp column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
5 months ago
I'm confident that option A is the best choice here. Fluentd is a powerful tool for log processing, and the filter-record-transformer plugin should do the trick to remove the PII data quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel