Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Strata Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam

Question #: 103
Topic #: 1

Which built-in feature of PAN-OS allows the NGFW administrator to create a policy that provides autoremediation for anomalous user behavior and malicious activity while maintaining user visibility?

ADynamic user groups (DUGS)

Btagging groups

Cremote device User-ID groups

Ddynamic address groups (DAGs)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Alyce at Jan 26, 2025, 12:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Nan

3 months ago

Dynamic user groups to the rescue! It's like having a superhero on your network, but without the cape and tights. Much more practical.

upvoted 0 times

Jeannetta

3 months ago

I agree, it's great to have that level of automation in place.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

3 months ago

Dynamic user groups are definitely a game changer for security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarina

4 months ago

I heard dynamic user groups are so powerful, they can even stop a hacker in their tracks. Or was that a super villain? Either way, got my vote!

upvoted 0 times

Christiane

3 months ago

D) dynamic address groups (DAGs)

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniel

3 months ago

C) remote device User-ID groups

upvoted 0 times

...

Salome

3 months ago

B) tagging groups

upvoted 0 times

...

Verona

3 months ago

A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS)

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitzie

4 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think D) dynamic address groups (DAGs) could also be a valid option for autoremediation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barney

4 months ago

Dynamic address groups (DAGs)? Really? That's for managing IP addresses, not user behavior. Clearly the answer is dynamic user groups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Naomi

4 months ago

Remote device User-ID groups? Nah, that's not quite the right feature for this scenario. I'm going with dynamic user groups.

upvoted 0 times

Eve

2 months ago

Tagging groups may not provide the same level of autoremediation as dynamic user groups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

2 months ago

What about tagging groups? Could that work as well?

upvoted 0 times

...

Bok

2 months ago

I agree, it allows for maintaining user visibility while addressing anomalous behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raina

3 months ago

I think dynamic user groups is the right choice for autoremediation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

4 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C) remote device User-ID groups. It makes more sense for maintaining user visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryan

4 months ago

Hmm, tagging groups could work too, but I'm not sure if they have the autoremediation feature. Dynamic user groups sound like the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Hillary

3 months ago

Tagging groups might work, but dynamic user groups offer better visibility and control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carma

3 months ago

Dynamic user groups (DUGS) definitely provide autoremediation for anomalous user behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Magnolia

4 months ago

I agree, tagging groups might not have the autoremediation feature we need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

4 months ago

Dynamic user groups (DUGS) definitely provide autoremediation for anomalous user behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

4 months ago

I think the answer is A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS). It allows for autoremediation and user visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

4 months ago

Dynamic user groups (DUGS) seem like the right choice here. They're designed to handle user behavior and malicious activity, right?

upvoted 0 times

Barbra

3 months ago

I agree, DUGS are perfect for handling user behavior and malicious activity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

4 months ago

Yeah, DUGS allow for autoremediation of anomalous user behavior while maintaining visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Natalie

4 months ago

I think Dynamic user groups (DUGS) would be the best option for that.

upvoted 0 times

...