Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Which built-in feature of PAN-OS allows the NGFW administrator to create a policy that provides autoremediation for anomalous user behavior and malicious activity while maintaining user visibility?
A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS)
B) tagging groups
C) remote device User-ID groups
D) dynamic address groups (DAGs)

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

Which built-in feature of PAN-OS allows the NGFW administrator to create a policy that provides autoremediation for anomalous user behavior and malicious activity while maintaining user visibility?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Alyce at Jan 26, 2025, 12:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Laurel
10 months ago
I’ve used dynamic address groups (DAGs) before, but not for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure about DUGS? Seems too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
10 months ago
DUGS sounds right, they really help with user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
11 months ago
Nah, I believe tagging groups are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
11 months ago
I think it's definitely Dynamic user groups (DUGS).
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
11 months ago
Dynamic address groups seem more focused on IP addresses rather than user behavior, so I doubt that's the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question on User-ID groups, but I don't remember if they were linked to anomalous behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
11 months ago
I feel like tagging groups could be relevant too, but I can't recall if they specifically handle autoremediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
11 months ago
I think the answer might be Dynamic user groups, but I'm not completely sure. I remember something about them being used for user behavior policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this. Dynamic user groups allow you to create policies that automatically respond to anomalous user behavior, which sounds like exactly what the question is asking about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to eliminate the options that don't seem relevant and then make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Dynamic user groups seem like the best fit based on the description of providing autoremediation and maintaining user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to review my notes on PAN-OS features to make sure I understand the differences between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verdell
12 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the different features and how they relate to user visibility and autoremediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
2 years ago
Dynamic user groups to the rescue! It's like having a superhero on your network, but without the cape and tights. Much more practical.
upvoted 0 times
Jeannetta
2 years ago
I agree, it's great to have that level of automation in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 years ago
Dynamic user groups are definitely a game changer for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sarina
2 years ago
I heard dynamic user groups are so powerful, they can even stop a hacker in their tracks. Or was that a super villain? Either way, got my vote!
upvoted 0 times
Christiane
2 years ago
D) dynamic address groups (DAGs)
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 years ago
C) remote device User-ID groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
2 years ago
B) tagging groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
2 years ago
A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitzie
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) dynamic address groups (DAGs) could also be a valid option for autoremediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
2 years ago
Dynamic address groups (DAGs)? Really? That's for managing IP addresses, not user behavior. Clearly the answer is dynamic user groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
2 years ago
Remote device User-ID groups? Nah, that's not quite the right feature for this scenario. I'm going with dynamic user groups.
upvoted 0 times
Eve
1 year ago
Tagging groups may not provide the same level of autoremediation as dynamic user groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
What about tagging groups? Could that work as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
1 year ago
I agree, it allows for maintaining user visibility while addressing anomalous behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
2 years ago
I think dynamic user groups is the right choice for autoremediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) remote device User-ID groups. It makes more sense for maintaining user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
2 years ago
Hmm, tagging groups could work too, but I'm not sure if they have the autoremediation feature. Dynamic user groups sound like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Hillary
2 years ago
Tagging groups might work, but dynamic user groups offer better visibility and control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 years ago
Dynamic user groups (DUGS) definitely provide autoremediation for anomalous user behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
2 years ago
I agree, tagging groups might not have the autoremediation feature we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
2 years ago
Dynamic user groups (DUGS) definitely provide autoremediation for anomalous user behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Dynamic user groups (DUGS). It allows for autoremediation and user visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 years ago
Dynamic user groups (DUGS) seem like the right choice here. They're designed to handle user behavior and malicious activity, right?
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
2 years ago
I agree, DUGS are perfect for handling user behavior and malicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
2 years ago
Yeah, DUGS allow for autoremediation of anomalous user behavior while maintaining visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
2 years ago
I think Dynamic user groups (DUGS) would be the best option for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel