Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam - Topic 3 Question 4 Discussion

A customer has acquired 10 new branch offices, each with fewer than 50 users and no existing firewall. The systems engineer wants to recommend a PA-Series NGFW with Advanced Threat Prevention at each branch location. Which NGFW series is the most cost-efficient at securing internet traffic?
B) PA-400
A) PA-200
C) PA-500
D) PA-600

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam - Topic 3 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 3
[All PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Questions]

A customer has acquired 10 new branch offices, each with fewer than 50 users and no existing firewall. The systems engineer wants to recommend a PA-Series NGFW with Advanced Threat Prevention at each branch location. Which NGFW series is the most cost-efficient at securing internet traffic?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The PA-400 Series is the most cost-efficient Palo Alto Networks NGFW for small branch offices. Let's analyze the options:

PA-400 Series (Recommended Option)

The PA-400 Series (PA-410, PA-415, etc.) is specifically designed for small to medium-sized branch offices with fewer than 50 users.

It provides all the necessary security features, including Advanced Threat Prevention, at a lower price point compared to higher-tier models.

It supports PAN-OS and Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS), making it suitable for securing internet traffic at branch locations.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect

PA-200: The PA-200 is an older model and is no longer available. It lacks the performance and features needed for modern branch office security.

PA-500: The PA-500 is also an older model that is not as cost-efficient as the PA-400 Series.

PA-600: The PA-600 Series does not exist.

Key Takeaways:

For branch offices with fewer than 50 users, the PA-400 Series offers the best balance of cost and performance.


Palo Alto Networks PA-400 Series Datasheet

by Loren at Jan 26, 2025, 02:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lynette
10 months ago
Not sure if PA-200 can handle advanced threats effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
10 months ago
Wait, are we really saying PA-200 is enough for security?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
10 months ago
I think PA-400 might be a better choice for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
11 months ago
Totally agree, PA-200 fits the user count perfectly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
11 months ago
PA-200 is the most cost-efficient option for small branches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
11 months ago
I recall that the PA-200 is often recommended for locations with fewer than 50 users, so I’m leaning towards that option for cost efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question about NGFWs, and I feel like the PA-400 could also be a contender, but I’m not confident about the cost aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
11 months ago
I think the PA-200 might be the right choice since it's designed for smaller environments, but I need to double-check the specs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
11 months ago
I remember studying the PA-Series, but I'm not entirely sure which one is the most cost-efficient for smaller branches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. Based on the user count and requirement for advanced threat prevention, I'd recommend the PA-400 as the most cost-efficient option. It has the right balance of features and performance for these small branch offices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
11 months ago
I'm a little confused. The question is asking about the most cost-efficient NGFW series, but it doesn't provide any pricing information. I'll need to research the different PA-Series models and their capabilities to make an informed decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The PA-200 is the most cost-efficient option for securing internet traffic at these small branch offices with fewer than 50 users. It has the advanced threat prevention features they need at the best price point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
12 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions "cost-efficient" but doesn't give us much detail on the specific requirements or budget. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
12 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question. I'll need to consider the number of users, the need for advanced threat prevention, and the cost-efficiency of each NGFW series.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
2 years ago
If budget is a serious concern, I'd go with the PA-200. It may not have all the bells and whistles, but it'll get the job done. Plus, it's probably the most 'firewall-y' sounding option.
upvoted 0 times
Mable
2 years ago
Yeah, the PA-200 may not have all the advanced features, but it's a solid choice for smaller branch offices with budget constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 years ago
I agree, the PA-200 is the most cost-efficient option for securing internet traffic at each branch office.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renea
2 years ago
I think the PA-400 could also be a good option, it offers a bit more performance than the PA-200 but is still cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
2 years ago
I agree with Carylon, the PA-500 has the right balance of performance and cost for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the PA-500 would be a better choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
2 years ago
I think the PA-200 would be the most cost-efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
2 years ago
The PA-500 seems like a good middle ground. It's not the cheapest, but it should have enough horsepower to handle the traffic at each branch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
2 years ago
I'm not sure the PA-200 is the best choice. With fewer than 50 users, the PA-400 might provide more features and performance without breaking the bank.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, the PA-400 could provide more features and performance for a similar cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
2 years ago
User 1: I think the PA-400 might be a better choice for those branch offices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
2 years ago
The PA-200 seems like the most cost-effective option for securing internet traffic at the branch offices. It's the smallest and most affordable NGFW in the PA-Series lineup.
upvoted 0 times
Yun
2 years ago
User 3: Agreed, the PA-200 is a good fit for small branch offices without breaking the budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, it's the most cost-effective option and should work well for fewer than 50 users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
2 years ago
User 1: I think the PA-200 would be the best choice for those branch offices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel