Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-SoftwareFirewall Exam - Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

Why are VM-Series firewalls and hardware firewalls that are external to the Kubernetes cluster problematic for protecting containerized workloads?
B) They are located outside the cluster and have no visibility into application-level cluster traffic.
A) They function differently based on whether they are located inside or outside of the cluster.
C) They are managed by another entity when located inside the cluster.
D) They do not scale independently of the Kubernetes cluster.

Palo Alto Networks PSE-SoftwareFirewall Exam - Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-SoftwareFirewall exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 4
[All PSE-SoftwareFirewall Questions]

Why are VM-Series firewalls and hardware firewalls that are external to the Kubernetes cluster problematic for protecting containerized workloads?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Visibility into application-level cluster traffic:

VM-Series firewalls and hardware firewalls that are external to the Kubernetes cluster lack the necessary visibility into the traffic and communications occurring at the application level within the cluster. This limitation impedes their ability to effectively protect containerized workloads.


Palo Alto Networks Kubernetes Security Guide

by Kenny at Jul 11, 2025, 02:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-SoftwareFirewall Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Viola
9 months ago
A is true, they really do function differently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
9 months ago
I disagree, external firewalls can still provide some level of protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
10 months ago
Wait, I thought hardware firewalls could be integrated better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
10 months ago
D seems a bit off, scaling can be managed with the right setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
10 months ago
B is spot on! No visibility means less security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the visibility issue is a key point. So, B seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the scaling issue could be a concern too. Maybe it's option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
11 months ago
I think option B makes sense because if they're outside, they can't see what's happening inside the cluster, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
11 months ago
I remember discussing how external firewalls might miss some of the internal traffic patterns in Kubernetes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
11 months ago
I think the scaling aspect is also important here. If the firewalls don't scale independently of the cluster, that could be a big issue for managing the security of containerized apps. I'll make sure to consider all the options before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
11 months ago
The visibility issue is definitely the main problem with having firewalls external to the cluster. They can't see the application-level traffic, so they won't be able to properly protect the containerized workloads. I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know firewalls located outside the cluster won't have visibility into the application-level traffic, but I'm not sure about the other options. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
12 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the key is understanding how VM-Series firewalls and hardware firewalls function differently when they're inside or outside the Kubernetes cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
1 year ago
Option B all the way! Kinda like trying to protect a secret club from the outside - you just don't have the inside scoop, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
1 year ago
I'm torn between B and D, but I think B is the better choice. Visibility is key, and if the firewall is outside the cluster, it's just not going to cut it.
upvoted 0 times
Colby
1 year ago
I agree, visibility into application-level cluster traffic is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Patria
1 year ago
D seems like the way to go. If the firewall can't scale independently, it won't be able to handle the dynamic nature of containerized environments.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
1 year ago
D) They do not scale independently of the Kubernetes cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
A) They function differently based on whether they are located inside or outside of the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sommer
1 year ago
I believe that they do not scale independently of the Kubernetes cluster, which can be a major limitation in dynamic environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
1 year ago
I'm going with C. If the firewall is managed by another entity inside the cluster, that could create problems for protecting the workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
1 year ago
I agree with you, Lizette. They have no visibility into application-level cluster traffic, which makes them less effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
1 year ago
Option B is the correct answer. Firewalls outside the cluster have no visibility into the cluster traffic, making it hard to protect containerized workloads.
upvoted 0 times
Daren
1 year ago
C) They are managed by another entity when located inside the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 year ago
B) They are located outside the cluster and have no visibility into application-level cluster traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
A) They function differently based on whether they are located inside or outside of the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laticia
1 year ago
I think VM-Series firewalls and external hardware firewalls are problematic for protecting containerized workloads because they are located outside the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel