U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks PSE-PrismaCloud Exam - Topic 4 Question 59 Discussion

Which statement explains the correlation between the block and alert thresholds in a vulnerability management policy?
D) The block threshold always has precedence over, and can be less than, the alert threshold.
A) The thresholds can be set to informational, low, medium, high, and critical.
B) The alert threshold always has precedence over, and can be greater than, the block threshold.
C) The block threshold must always be equal to or greater than the alert threshold.

Palo Alto Networks PSE-PrismaCloud Exam - Topic 4 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-PrismaCloud exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 4
[All PSE-PrismaCloud Questions]

Which statement explains the correlation between the block and alert thresholds in a vulnerability management policy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ria
7 months ago
D sounds weird, I doubt that's right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
7 months ago
A is just about the levels, not the correlation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
7 months ago
Wait, how can B be true? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
8 months ago
Totally agree with C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
8 months ago
I think C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
8 months ago
I’m confused about the precedence part; I thought the block threshold was more critical, but I might be mixing it up with another practice question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
8 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because it makes sense that you wouldn't want to block something unless it’s already been flagged as a concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question about thresholds, and I feel like the alert threshold is supposed to trigger before blocking, but I can't recall the exact wording.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
9 months ago
I think the block threshold should be higher than the alert threshold, but I'm not completely sure if it has to be equal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
9 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it. The block threshold has to be equal to or greater than the alert threshold. That makes sense in a vulnerability management policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll try to break it down step-by-step and see if I can figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
9 months ago
I think the key is understanding the relationship between the two thresholds. The wording of the options is pretty specific, so I'll need to read them closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
9 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
9 months ago
Okay, let's see. The block and alert thresholds must be related somehow, but I'm not sure exactly how.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
9 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this. The ACL is only applied to 1/1/1, so the HTTPS traffic on 1/1/2 should be allowed by the implicit rules. I'll double-check my work, but I think I've got the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the context and requirements properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old battle of the thresholds! Option C is clearly the way to go - you don't want to be blocking less than you're alerting on, that's just asking for a security headache. Unless, of course, you're a fan of living on the edge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 year ago
I'm going with option D. The block threshold should always have precedence, even if it's lower than the alert threshold. That way, we can make sure the really bad stuff never makes it through.
upvoted 0 times
Dorthy
12 months ago
User 3: Definitely. Blocking should always take precedence to protect our systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
12 months ago
User 2: I agree. It's better to be safe than sorry, even if the alert threshold is higher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D makes sense. We need to prioritize blocking the really bad stuff.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cruz
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old question of block vs. alert thresholds. Option C is the way to go - you don't want to be blocking more than you're alerting on, that's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
1 year ago
Option B seems like the right answer to me. The alert threshold should take precedence over the block threshold to ensure we're notified of all potential issues, even if some aren't blocked.
upvoted 0 times
Annett
1 year ago
User 3: Yes, having the alert threshold greater than the block threshold ensures we are aware of all vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
1 year ago
User 2: I agree. It's important to be alerted about all potential issues, even if they are not blocked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 year ago
User 1: I think option B is correct. The alert threshold should have precedence over the block threshold.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Donette
1 year ago
I was a bit confused about the relationship between the thresholds, but option C makes sense. It's important to have the block threshold at least as high as the alert threshold to maintain security.
upvoted 0 times
Stanford
1 year ago
User 3: Option C makes more sense to me, the block threshold should be equal to or greater than the alert threshold.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
1 year ago
User 2: I agree with Reuben, having different levels of thresholds is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
User 1: I think option A is correct, it allows for different levels of severity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tesha
1 year ago
But if the alert threshold is greater than the block threshold, wouldn't that defeat the purpose of blocking potential vulnerabilities?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
1 year ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 year ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The block threshold must always be equal to or greater than the alert threshold to ensure that any vulnerabilities above the alert level are also blocked.
upvoted 0 times
Dahlia
1 year ago
I think option B is the correct answer, as the alert threshold should take precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still believe option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
1 year ago
I think option A is more accurate. Having different levels of thresholds allows for better customization of the policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 year ago
I agree, option C makes sense. It's important to have the block threshold higher than the alert threshold.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
1 year ago
I think option A is more accurate, as it provides a range of thresholds to choose from.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
1 year ago
I think option A is also valid. Having different levels of thresholds allows for better categorization of vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
I agree, option C makes sense. It's important to have the block threshold higher to prevent any potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
1 year ago
I agree with you, option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
But if the block threshold is lower than the alert threshold, wouldn't that defeat the purpose of blocking potential threats?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel