Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-PrismaCloud Exam - Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

When protecting against attempts to exploit client-side and server-side vulnerabilities, what is the Palo Alto Networks best practice when using NGFW Vulnerability Protection Profiles?
D) Clone the predefined Strict Profile, with packet capture settings enabled
A) Use the default Vulnerability Protection Profile to protect clients from all known critical, high, and medium-severity threats
B) Clone the predefined Strict Profile, with packet capture settings disabled
C) Use the default Vulnerability Protection Profile to protect servers from all known critical, high, and medium-severity threats

Palo Alto Networks PSE-PrismaCloud Exam - Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-PrismaCloud exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 4
[All PSE-PrismaCloud Questions]

When protecting against attempts to exploit client-side and server-side vulnerabilities, what is the Palo Alto Networks best practice when using NGFW Vulnerability Protection Profiles?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Jolanda at May 04, 2022, 04:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-PrismaCloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dottie
9 months ago
Using the default for servers too? Seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
9 months ago
I thought packet capture was essential for monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
9 months ago
Wait, isn't cloning the Strict Profile better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
10 months ago
Definitely agree, the default covers a lot!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
10 months ago
I always go with the default profile for client protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards cloning the Strict Profile with packet capture enabled, but I’m not entirely confident if that’s the right choice for both clients and servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
10 months ago
I feel like using the default profile for clients is common, but I wonder if it really covers everything we need for server protection too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
10 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that protecting servers is often prioritized, but I can't remember if that's the default profile or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
10 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of customizing profiles instead of just using defaults, but I'm not sure if cloning the Strict Profile is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. Risk identification and assessment workshops are used to, well, identify and assess risks, right? So I'm thinking Option B is the right answer here - they're used to identify threats as part of project initiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
10 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. For the priority and resolution time prediction, the AI Platform seems like the right choice since it's a general-purpose ML service. And for sentiment analysis, the Cloud Natural Language API looks like the most appropriate option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
10 months ago
Okay, let me see here. H-VPLS solves the data-plane and control-plane issues, so the concern it doesn't solve must be one of the other options. I'm leaning towards E - increased bandwidth and replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
10 months ago
I'm not too familiar with Kerberos, so this one has me a bit stumped. I'd probably need to review my notes on authentication protocols before I could confidently answer this. But my initial guess would be option D, LDAP, since it's commonly used for authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel