New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-PrismaCloud Exam - Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-PrismaCloud exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 4
[All PSE-PrismaCloud Questions]

When protecting against attempts to exploit client-side and server-side vulnerabilities, what is the Palo Alto Networks best practice when using NGFW Vulnerability Protection Profiles?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Jolanda at May 04, 2022, 04:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-PrismaCloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dottie
4 months ago
Using the default for servers too? Seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
4 months ago
I thought packet capture was essential for monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
4 months ago
Wait, isn't cloning the Strict Profile better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
4 months ago
Definitely agree, the default covers a lot!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
4 months ago
I always go with the default profile for client protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards cloning the Strict Profile with packet capture enabled, but I’m not entirely confident if that’s the right choice for both clients and servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
5 months ago
I feel like using the default profile for clients is common, but I wonder if it really covers everything we need for server protection too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
5 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that protecting servers is often prioritized, but I can't remember if that's the default profile or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of customizing profiles instead of just using defaults, but I'm not sure if cloning the Strict Profile is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Risk identification and assessment workshops are used to, well, identify and assess risks, right? So I'm thinking Option B is the right answer here - they're used to identify threats as part of project initiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. For the priority and resolution time prediction, the AI Platform seems like the right choice since it's a general-purpose ML service. And for sentiment analysis, the Cloud Natural Language API looks like the most appropriate option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
5 months ago
Okay, let me see here. H-VPLS solves the data-plane and control-plane issues, so the concern it doesn't solve must be one of the other options. I'm leaning towards E - increased bandwidth and replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
5 months ago
I'm not too familiar with Kerberos, so this one has me a bit stumped. I'd probably need to review my notes on authentication protocols before I could confidently answer this. But my initial guess would be option D, LDAP, since it's commonly used for authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel