New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks PSE-PrismaCloud Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-PrismaCloud exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-PrismaCloud Questions]

An administrator has deployed an AWS transit gateway and used multiple VPC spokes to segregate a multi-tier application. The administrator also created a security VPC with multiple VM-Series NGFWs in an active/active deployment model via ECMP using Amazon Web Services VPN-based attachments.

What must be configured on the firewall to avoid asymmetric routing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vilma
4 months ago
Wait, why would you need both source and destination translation? That seems excessive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
4 months ago
Not sure about that, sounds a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
4 months ago
I think destination address translation might work too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
4 months ago
Definitely need source address translation for that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
Asymmetric routing can cause issues with stateful firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
5 months ago
I recall that using source address translation is often recommended to avoid issues, but I’m not sure if it’s the only thing needed in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options. I thought both source and destination address translation could be necessary to prevent asymmetric routing, but I’m not certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
5 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to configure firewalls for routing. I feel like source address translation might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
5 months ago
I remember we discussed asymmetric routing in class, but I'm not entirely sure which translation method to use here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to focus on the information in the UE subscription, which is what the MME uses to assign the DCN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
5 months ago
Okay, let me see... I'm pretty sure the "Resource" field is where the external attributes would be mapped, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and options to figure out the right steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards the Service Perimeter Guard pattern, but I'm worried about its effectiveness when it comes to handling the access levels correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
9 months ago
I'm going with D. Wouldn't want those packets taking a trip around the world and ending up back where they started, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
9 months ago
Definitely D. You can't have your packets going all over the place like a bunch of lost socks. Address translation is key to keeping things nice and tidy.
upvoted 0 times
Crissy
8 months ago
D) source and destination address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
8 months ago
C) port address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
8 months ago
B) destination address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
8 months ago
A) source address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
8 months ago
C) port address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
8 months ago
B) destination address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
9 months ago
A) source address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Abel
10 months ago
Haha, asymmetric routing? More like 'a-symmetric' routing if you ask me. But in all seriousness, D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Makeda
8 months ago
Definitely, D is the way to go to ensure proper routing with the firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
9 months ago
I agree, D is the correct choice to avoid asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
9 months ago
D) source and destination address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
9 months ago
C) port address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
9 months ago
B) destination address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
9 months ago
A) source address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominga
10 months ago
D seems like the right choice here. The firewall needs to translate both source and destination addresses to ensure the traffic flow is symmetric across the network.
upvoted 0 times
Bettina
10 months ago
D) source and destination address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
A) source address translation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reta
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D) source and destination address translation to avoid any routing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
11 months ago
I think the answer is D. Source and destination address translation is necessary to avoid asymmetric routing in this scenario with a transit gateway and multiple VPC spokes.
upvoted 0 times
Cory
9 months ago
It's crucial to have both source and destination address translation to maintain consistent routing paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
9 months ago
Yes, that's correct. It ensures that traffic flows smoothly without any routing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
9 months ago
I think it's important to configure both source and destination address translation on the firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
9 months ago
I agree, source and destination address translation is the key to avoid asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
11 months ago
I agree with Delsie, source address translation would help avoid asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) source address translation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel