Palo Alto Networks PSE-Platform Exam - Topic 3 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam

Question #: 71
Topic #: 3

A client chooses to not block uncategorized websites.

Which two additions should be made to help provide some protection? (Choose two.)

AA security policy rule using only known URL categories with the action set to allow

BA file blocking profile to security policy rules that allow uncategorized websites to help reduce the risk of drive by downloads

CA URL filtering profile with the action set to continue for unknown URL categories to security policy rules that allow web access

DA data filtering profile with a custom data pattern to security policy rules that deny uncategorized websites

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C

by Theodora at Sep 16, 2024, 06:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lauran

3 months ago

I agree with B, but C seems a bit too lenient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamela

3 months ago

D could be useful too, but it depends on the context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domitila

3 months ago

Wait, why would you allow uncategorized sites at all? Seems risky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tony

4 months ago

I think A is a better choice, honestly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theron

4 months ago

Definitely B and C for some extra safety.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

4 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the data filtering profile option. I thought it was more about preventing data leaks rather than blocking uncategorized websites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xenia

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between allowing and denying uncategorized sites. I feel like a security policy rule with known URL categories might be a safer choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hailey

4 months ago

I think adding a file blocking profile could help mitigate risks from drive-by downloads, but I can't recall if it was specifically for uncategorized sites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestina

5 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of using URL filtering profiles, but I'm not sure if "continue" is the right action for unknown categories.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

5 months ago

This is a good test of our security policy and filtering knowledge. I'm going to carefully consider each option and choose the two that I think will provide the most effective protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fidelia

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. A security policy rule using known URL categories and a file blocking profile to reduce the risk of drive-by downloads seem like a good combination.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irene

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the different security policy and filtering options to see which two would work best to address the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christene

5 months ago

This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the best way to provide some protection without completely blocking uncategorized websites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliana

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure on this one. The options don't seem to directly match the question. I'll have to think it through carefully before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karan

1 year ago

This is a classic case of 'you gotta cover all your bases.' B and C are the obvious choices, but who knows what kind of crazy stuff could be hiding in those uncategorized websites, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Aleisha

1 year ago

User 3: Good point. We need to cover all our bases to protect against any potential threats.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elly

1 year ago

Agreed. We should also add a URL filtering profile with the action set to continue for unknown URL categories.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carole

1 year ago

We should definitely add a file blocking profile to reduce the risk of drive by downloads.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

1 year ago

But adding known URL categories and continuing for unknown categories can provide some protection against uncategorized websites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Patrick

1 year ago

Haha, I bet the client is regretting that choice now. B and C are the way to go, no doubt. Wouldn't want any nasty malware sneaking in, right?

upvoted 0 times

Brett

1 year ago

Chery: Absolutely, those extra layers of protection can make a big difference.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

1 year ago

Better to be safe than sorry, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Chery

1 year ago

I agree, adding a file blocking profile and a URL filtering profile is a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

1 year ago

Yeah, definitely should have blocked those uncategorized websites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilma

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe option B and D are better choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

1 year ago

I think option A and C should be added.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

1 year ago

Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B and C as well, but D could be an interesting option too. Gotta protect against those drive-by downloads!

upvoted 0 times

Daniel

1 year ago

That's true, having a security policy rule with known URL categories and a data filtering profile for custom data patterns could provide extra security measures.

upvoted 0 times

...