Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Platform Topic 1 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Platform Questions]

A price sensitive customer wants to prevent attacks on a windows 2008 Virtual Server. The server will max out at 100Mbps but needs to have 45,000 sessions to connect to multiple hosts within a data center

Which VM instance should be used to secure the network by this customer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Susana at Jul 17, 2024, 03:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lachelle
11 months ago
I wonder if the VM-50 can do the job with a bit of optimization. It might be a more budget-friendly option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
11 months ago
I'm no network expert, but the VM-300 sounds like it can handle the job. Plus, it has a cool name - who doesn't love a big, powerful VM?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
11 months ago
Hmm, the VM-200 could be a good compromise between performance and cost. But the VM-300 might be the safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
12 months ago
The VM-100 seems a bit underpowered for this scenario. I'd go with the VM-300 to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Yan
11 months ago
VM-300 should be able to handle the load and keep the network secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
11 months ago
I agree, VM-300 seems like a safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
11 months ago
I think the VM-200 could also handle the workload, but the VM-300 would provide better security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
11 months ago
I agree, the VM-300 would be the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
11 months ago
I think VM-100 might not be enough for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edison
12 months ago
That makes sense, thanks for explaining.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
12 months ago
VM-200 has higher capacity and can handle more sessions, which is important for connecting to multiple hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
12 months ago
I think the VM-300 would be a great choice to secure the network. It can handle the high traffic and session requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Maxima
11 months ago
I think VM-300 is worth the investment for better security and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
11 months ago
True, VM-200 could work too. It depends on the customer's budget and specific needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
11 months ago
But wouldn't VM-200 also be a good choice? It's a bit cheaper and might still meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
12 months ago
I agree, VM-300 seems like the best option for this customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edison
1 years ago
Why do you think VM-200 is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
1 years ago
I disagree, I believe VM-200 would be a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
1 years ago
I think the customer should go with VM-100.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel