New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Platform Exam - Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Platform Questions]

An endpoint, inside an organization, is infected with known malware. The malware attempts to make a command and control connection to a C&C server via the destination IP address.

Which mechanism prevent this connection from succeeding?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Merri at May 31, 2024, 09:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cammy
3 months ago
Wildfire Analysis is cool, but not for this specific case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
3 months ago
Wait, can DNS Sinkholing really stop all C&C connections?
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
3 months ago
Definitely agree with DNS Sinkholing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
4 months ago
I think Anti-Spyware Signatures could help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
4 months ago
DNS Sinkholing is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
4 months ago
Wildfire analysis sounds familiar, but I feel like it's more about analyzing threats rather than preventing connections directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
4 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice test where we discussed DNS proxies, but I don't think they actually block connections like sinkholing does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about anti-spyware signatures being useful for detecting malware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
5 months ago
I think DNS sinkholing could be the right answer since it redirects malicious traffic away from the C&C server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
5 months ago
Wildfire analysis could be useful for identifying and analyzing the malware, but it doesn't directly prevent the connection from succeeding. I think I'll have to rule that one out and focus on the network-level solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
5 months ago
DNS sinkholing is the way to go here. It redirects the malware's attempt to connect to the C&C server to a harmless IP address, effectively blocking the connection. I'm confident this is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know DNS sinkholing and proxies can be used to block malicious connections, but I'm not sure which one is the best fit for this scenario. I'll have to think it through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about network security mechanisms. I'll think through the options carefully and choose the one that best prevents the malware from connecting to the C&C server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the potential consequences of the data type change and how that might impact the existing shipment records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different namespace declarations in these schemas. I'll need to make sure I understand how they're being used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. I'm not sure exactly what "Runtime Resources" are or why controlling remote console access to them would be important. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
10 months ago
Ah, the age-old battle between malware and cybersecurity. I bet the C&C server is sweating bullets right about now.
upvoted 0 times
Pura
8 months ago
C) Anti-Spyware Signatures
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
8 months ago
B) DNS Proxy
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
8 months ago
A) DNS Sinkholing
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
9 months ago
C) Anti-Spyware Signatures
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
9 months ago
B) DNS Proxy
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
9 months ago
A) DNS Sinkholing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenora
10 months ago
Wildfire Analysis? Sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie. I'll stick with the good old DNS Sinkholing.
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
8 months ago
Wildfire Analysis might sound futuristic, but DNS Sinkholing is a classic choice for blocking malicious connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
9 months ago
I think Anti-Spyware Signatures could also be effective in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
10 months ago
I agree, DNS Sinkholing is a reliable way to prevent those connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenna
10 months ago
Anti-Spyware Signatures? Really? That's like trying to catch a speeding bullet with a butterfly net.
upvoted 0 times
Kris
8 months ago
D) Wildfire Analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
9 months ago
C) Anti-Spyware Signatures
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
9 months ago
B) DNS Proxy
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
9 months ago
A) DNS Sinkholing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rasheeda
10 months ago
I'm not sure about the other options, but DNS Proxy sounds like it could also work by intercepting and controlling the DNS traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
10 months ago
DNS Sinkholing seems like the obvious choice here. It redirects the malware's attempt to connect to the C&C server to a benign destination, effectively blocking the connection.
upvoted 0 times
Arminda
9 months ago
C) Anti-Spyware Signatures
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
9 months ago
That's correct! DNS Sinkholing redirects the connection to a benign destination, stopping the malware from reaching the C&C server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
10 months ago
A) DNS Sinkholing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Anti-Spyware Signatures could also be a valid mechanism to prevent the connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
11 months ago
I agree with Sheridan, DNS Sinkholing can prevent the connection to the C&C server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) DNS Sinkholing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel