Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Platform Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

A service provider has acquired a pair of PA-7080s for its data center to secure its customer base's traffic. The server provider's traffic is largely generated by smart phones and averages 6,000,000 concurrent sessions.Which Network Processing Card should be recommended in the Bill of Materials?
B) PA-7000-20GQ-NPC and C) PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC
A) PA-7000-40G-NPC
D) PA-7000-20G-NPC

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Platform Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Platform Questions]

A service provider has acquired a pair of PA-7080s for its data center to secure its customer base's traffic. The server provider's traffic is largely generated by smart phones and averages 6,000,000 concurrent sessions.

Which Network Processing Card should be recommended in the Bill of Materials?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Willow at May 08, 2024, 08:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Demetra
8 months ago
The PA-7000-20G-NPC might be enough for that load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
9 months ago
Wait, 6 million sessions? That sounds a bit high, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
9 months ago
Not so sure, the PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC could handle it too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
9 months ago
Definitely agree, 40G seems like the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
9 months ago
I think the PA-7000-40G-NPC is the best choice for high traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between the 20G and 40G cards. I hope I can recall the right details during the exam!
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question before, and I think the 20G options might not be enough for such a high number of concurrent sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
10 months ago
I think the PA-7000-40G-NPC might be the right choice since it has higher throughput, but I need to double-check the specs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
10 months ago
I remember that the PA-7000 series has different options based on throughput, but I'm not sure which one handles 6 million sessions best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. Based on the traffic volume, I'd go with option A, the PA-7000-40G-NPC. It should have the capacity to handle 6,000,000 concurrent sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The traffic is largely from smartphones, so I'll need to consider factors like packet size and latency. I think I know the right answer, but I'll double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
10 months ago
The key here is to match the Network Processing Card's capabilities to the service provider's traffic requirements. I'd recommend carefully comparing the throughput and session handling of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the specs on those Network Processing Cards to see which one can handle 6,000,000 concurrent sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
10 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward networking question. I'll need to think about the traffic requirements and the capabilities of the different Network Processing Cards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
10 months ago
The drug name Quinapril sounds like it could be an ACE inhibitor, so I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the differences here. Layer 2 VPNs use AToM and IPsec tunneling, while Layer 3 VPNs use MPLS/BGP and pseudowires. I'll select those options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 year ago
I'm sure the PA-7000-20G-NPC would work just fine, but let's be honest, if I'm paying for this, I want the biggest and baddest NPC out there. Go big or go home, right? The PA-7000-40G-NPC is the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm torn between the PA-7000-40G-NPC and the PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC. Maybe I should just flip a coin and let fate decide. Or maybe I should just ask Siri, she always knows the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
1 year ago
I'm going to have to disagree with you all. The PA-7000-20G-NPC is the way to go. It's the most cost-effective option and should still be able to manage the traffic. Who needs all those extra bells and whistles anyway?
upvoted 0 times
Marquetta
1 year ago
D: I see your point, but I still think the PA-7000-20G-NPC is the most cost-effective option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
1 year ago
C: I'm leaning towards the PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC, it offers a good balance of performance and cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 year ago
B: I disagree, I believe the PA-7000-40G-NPC would provide the necessary processing power for the data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
1 year ago
A: I think the PA-7000-20GQ-NPC would be the best choice for handling that amount of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martin
1 year ago
The PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC seems like a good choice here. It can handle the 6,000,000 concurrent sessions and has the added benefit of supporting 40G interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
Stefanie
1 year ago
The PA-7000-40G-NPC might be overkill for this scenario, as it is designed for higher bandwidth requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
1 year ago
I think the PA-7000-20GQ-NPC could also be a good option, as it offers a balance between performance and cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 year ago
I agree, the PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC is a solid choice for handling the high number of concurrent sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Truman
1 year ago
With 6,000,000 concurrent sessions, we'll need a high-performance NPC to handle the load. I'd recommend the PA-7000-40G-NPC to ensure the data center can keep up with the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Elliot
1 year ago
Yes, the PA-7000-40G-NPC will provide the necessary performance for the data center's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
1 year ago
I agree, the PA-7000-40G-NPC is the best option for handling that amount of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valda
1 year ago
I see both points, but I personally think option B) PA-7000-20GQ-NPC is the best option for this scenario as it offers a good balance of performance and cost efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C) PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC would be a better choice as it provides a balance between performance and cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
1 year ago
I think we should go with option A) PA-7000-40G-NPC because it offers the highest throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel