Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Platform Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam

Question #: 60
Topic #: 1

A service provider has acquired a pair of PA-7080s for its data center to secure its customer base's traffic. The server provider's traffic is largely generated by smart phones and averages 6,000,000 concurrent sessions.

Which Network Processing Card should be recommended in the Bill of Materials?

APA-7000-40G-NPC

BPA-7000-20GQ-NPC

CPA-7000-20GQXM-NPC

DPA-7000-20G-NPC

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

by Willow at May 08, 2024, 08:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Freeman

2 months ago

I'm sure the PA-7000-20G-NPC would work just fine, but let's be honest, if I'm paying for this, I want the biggest and baddest NPC out there. Go big or go home, right? The PA-7000-40G-NPC is the way to go, no doubt.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reiko

2 months ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm torn between the PA-7000-40G-NPC and the PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC. Maybe I should just flip a coin and let fate decide. Or maybe I should just ask Siri, she always knows the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

2 months ago

I'm going to have to disagree with you all. The PA-7000-20G-NPC is the way to go. It's the most cost-effective option and should still be able to manage the traffic. Who needs all those extra bells and whistles anyway?

upvoted 0 times

Marquetta

15 days ago

D: I see your point, but I still think the PA-7000-20G-NPC is the most cost-effective option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashon

17 days ago

C: I'm leaning towards the PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC, it offers a good balance of performance and cost.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

19 days ago

B: I disagree, I believe the PA-7000-40G-NPC would provide the necessary processing power for the data center.

upvoted 0 times

...

Silva

1 months ago

A: I think the PA-7000-20GQ-NPC would be the best choice for handling that amount of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martin

2 months ago

The PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC seems like a good choice here. It can handle the 6,000,000 concurrent sessions and has the added benefit of supporting 40G interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

Stefanie

1 months ago

The PA-7000-40G-NPC might be overkill for this scenario, as it is designed for higher bandwidth requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nathalie

2 months ago

I think the PA-7000-20GQ-NPC could also be a good option, as it offers a balance between performance and cost.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

2 months ago

I agree, the PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC is a solid choice for handling the high number of concurrent sessions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

3 months ago

With 6,000,000 concurrent sessions, we'll need a high-performance NPC to handle the load. I'd recommend the PA-7000-40G-NPC to ensure the data center can keep up with the traffic.

upvoted 0 times

Elliot

2 months ago

Yes, the PA-7000-40G-NPC will provide the necessary performance for the data center's needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annett

2 months ago

I agree, the PA-7000-40G-NPC is the best option for handling that amount of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valda

3 months ago

I see both points, but I personally think option B) PA-7000-20GQ-NPC is the best option for this scenario as it offers a good balance of performance and cost efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brice

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe option C) PA-7000-20GQXM-NPC would be a better choice as it provides a balance between performance and cost.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

3 months ago

I think we should go with option A) PA-7000-40G-NPC because it offers the highest throughput.

upvoted 0 times

...