New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Platform Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Platform Questions]

A network covers three geographical areas: Americas, Europe (EMEA), and Asia (APAC). The APAC segment of the network consists of nine HA pairs of PA-3060 firewalls, generating a combined log output of 25 K logs per second. Only 14 days of traffic log retention is required.

Which management and logging solution will be effective and cost-efficient for this segment of the network?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rosendo
4 months ago
Wait, 16 TB for APAC? That seems excessive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
4 months ago
D sounds interesting, but I’m not sure about dual-mode efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
4 months ago
Definitely going with A, 4 TB should be enough for 14 days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
4 months ago
I think C is overkill for just 25K logs/sec.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
4 months ago
Option B seems solid with the 8 TB storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C since it mentions two log collector-mode M-500s, which seems like it would handle the log volume better, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
5 months ago
I feel like we covered something about M-500s in HA mode, but I can't recall if we need one or two for effective logging in APAC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
5 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar from our practice questions, but I'm not entirely sure if 8 TB is enough for 14 days of logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of log retention and how it impacts storage needs. 14 days isn't too long, but 25K logs per second adds up quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
5 months ago
I've worked with RESTCONF and YANG before, so I feel pretty confident about this. The module name in the response is "left-interfaces", so the correct answer is option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the details before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
10 months ago
Wait, so we're managing networks across three continents? I hope the IT team has a good travel budget!
upvoted 0 times
Danica
9 months ago
Definitely, having a centralized management and logging solution is crucial for a network of this scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
9 months ago
I think option C with two log collector-mode M-500s in a log collector group with 16 TB of storage for APAC would be the most effective and cost-efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
9 months ago
Yeah, it seems like a big operation. They must have a solid management and logging solution in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eva
10 months ago
Option C is the way to go! Two log collector-mode M-500s in a group provide redundancy and ample storage for the APAC segment. It's the most future-proof solution.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
9 months ago
Definitely, it's important to choose a solution that can handle the current load and also be scalable for future needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
9 months ago
It's important to consider future needs when choosing a management and logging solution, and option C seems to cover that aspect well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
9 months ago
Having two log collector-mode M-500s in a group definitely provides a good balance of redundancy and storage capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
9 months ago
Having redundancy and ample storage is crucial for managing the high log output in that region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
9 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most reliable choice for managing and storing logs in the APAC segment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
9 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most reliable choice for the APAC segment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
10 months ago
Option D is overkill for this scenario. We don't need dual-mode M-500s when a single log collector-mode M-500 can handle the APAC segment's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
10 months ago
I'm not sure if the M-100 in Option A would have enough storage for the 25K logs per second. The M-500 in Option B seems like a better fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
10 months ago
Option B seems like the most cost-effective solution. The M-500 with 8 TB of storage should be able to handle the log retention requirements for the APAC segment.
upvoted 0 times
Laura
10 months ago
Yes, having one log collector-mode M-500 with 8 TB of storage should meet the log retention needs efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
10 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like a cost-effective solution for the APAC segment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nathan
11 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option D could also be a good choice since it offers dual-mode M-500s for both management and storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
11 months ago
I agree with you, Demetra. Having two log collector-mode M-500s with 16 TB of storage would ensure efficient log retention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
11 months ago
I think option C would be the best choice for this network segment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel