Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Platform Exam - Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

How do Highly Suspicious artifacts in-AutoFocus help identify when an unknown, potential zero-day, targeted attack occur to allow one to adjust the security posture?
A) Highly Suspicious artifacts are associated with High-Risk payloads that are inflicting massive amounts of damage to end customers.
B) All High Risk artifacts are automatically classified as Highly Suspicious.
C) Highly Suspicious artifacts are High Risk artifacts that have been seen in very few samples.
D) Highly Suspicious artifacts have been seen infecting a broad, significant range of companies.

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Platform Exam - Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Platform Questions]

How do Highly Suspicious artifacts in-AutoFocus help identify when an unknown, potential zero-day, targeted attack occur to allow one to adjust the security posture?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Samira at Apr 01, 2023, 07:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tyisha
11 months ago
D seems off; not all suspicious artifacts infect a wide range of companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
11 months ago
Wait, how can we be sure these artifacts are actually dangerous?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
11 months ago
C makes the most sense—rare samples can indicate something serious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
11 months ago
Not all High Risk artifacts are Highly Suspicious, that's misleading!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
11 months ago
I think Highly Suspicious artifacts are definitely linked to High-Risk payloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
12 months ago
I thought Highly Suspicious artifacts were more about the breadth of infection across companies, which makes me lean towards option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
12 months ago
I feel like all High-Risk artifacts aren't necessarily Highly Suspicious, but I can't recall the specifics on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
12 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned how rare samples can indicate a potential zero-day, so maybe option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
12 months ago
I think Highly Suspicious artifacts are linked to High-Risk payloads, but I'm not sure if they always cause massive damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
12 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on condition determination coverage. I'll need to carefully analyze the code fragment to determine the number of conditions and then figure out the minimum number of test cases to cover them all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
12 months ago
This sounds similar to a practice question I did about how to handle sensitive information. I think "X-Out" makes sense for showing just part of the number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
12 months ago
No problem, I've seen questions like this before. I've got a good strategy for tackling it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 year ago
Hmm, let me consult my magic 8-ball on this one. It says the answer is 'Reply hazy, try again.'
upvoted 0 times
Nilsa
1 year ago
D) Highly Suspicious artifacts have been seen infecting a broad, significant range of companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 year ago
C) Highly Suspicious artifacts are High Risk artifacts that have been seen in very few samples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
1 year ago
A) Highly Suspicious artifacts are associated with High-Risk payloads that are inflicting massive amounts of damage to end customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jutta
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the right answer is 'All of the above' because AutoFocus is just a fancy name for crystal ball.
upvoted 0 times
Brande
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think 'Highly Suspicious artifacts are associated with High-Risk payloads that are inflicting massive amounts of damage to end customers.' could also be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is 'Highly Suspicious artifacts are High Risk artifacts that have been seen in very few samples.'
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
1 year ago
I think the answer is 'All of the above' too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paz
1 year ago
A makes no sense. Highly Suspicious artifacts are not necessarily associated with massive damage. That's just FUD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
1 year ago
B is definitely wrong. Not all High Risk artifacts are automatically Highly Suspicious. Seems like a trick question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
1 year ago
I'm going with D. Highly Suspicious artifacts that have been seen infecting a broad range of companies are likely to be zero-day attacks that need immediate attention.
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
1 year ago
User4: It's important to stay vigilant and respond promptly to any potential zero-day attacks. D seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 year ago
User3: Highly Suspicious artifacts are definitely a cause for concern. We should prioritize them in our security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 year ago
User2: I agree. Those artifacts are probably part of a zero-day attack that needs to be addressed quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
1 year ago
User1: I think D is the best option. It makes sense to focus on artifacts that have infected many companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
1 year ago
Marya: Absolutely, staying proactive is key in protecting against targeted attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely. It's important to adjust the security posture quickly when dealing with such threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
1 year ago
User 2: I agree. Those artifacts are likely to be zero-day attacks that could cause a lot of damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 year ago
User 1: I think D is the best option. It makes sense to focus on artifacts that have infected many companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salena
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think C makes more sense in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer. Highly Suspicious artifacts are those that have been seen in very few samples, indicating they could be new or rare threats.
upvoted 0 times
Oren
1 year ago
So, Highly Suspicious artifacts help identify potential zero-day attacks by being rare or new threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
1 year ago
That's right, it indicates they could be new or rare threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 year ago
Yes, Highly Suspicious artifacts are those that have been seen in very few samples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Owen
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D. Highly Suspicious artifacts infect a broad range of companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 year ago
I think the answer is C, because Highly Suspicious artifacts are rare and seen in very few samples.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel