Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Endpoint Exam - Topic 2 Question 67 Discussion

An Administrator has identified an EPM-triggered false positive and has used the Create Rule button from within the relevant entry in the Security Events > Preventions > Exploits tab. What is the result of the created rule?
B) The new rule stops all EPM injection into processes on the machine on which the prevention was triggered.
A) The new rule stops all EPM injection into the faulted process.
C) The new rule excludes the endpoint from Traps protection.
D) The new rule will include the EPM that raised the prevention, the process that triggered the prevention, the machine on which the prevention was triggered, and a descriptive name for the rule.

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Endpoint Exam - Topic 2 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Endpoint exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 2
[All PSE-Endpoint Questions]

An Administrator has identified an EPM-triggered false positive and has used the Create Rule button from within the relevant entry in the Security Events > Preventions > Exploits tab. What is the result of the created rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Rosita at Jun 29, 2024, 10:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Endpoint Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Anna
8 months ago
Sounds like a solid way to manage false positives!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
9 months ago
Wait, does it really stop all EPM injection? That seems a bit extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
9 months ago
I’m pretty sure it includes details about the process and machine too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
9 months ago
Definitely goes beyond just stopping EPM injection, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
9 months ago
I think the new rule just targets the specific process that triggered it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
9 months ago
If I recall correctly, the rule should provide a comprehensive description including the EPM and the process, which seems to align with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether the rule stops all EPM injections or just the one that caused the issue. I feel like I need to review that section again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
10 months ago
I remember a practice question about EPM rules, and I think it mentioned that the new rule would include details about the process and machine involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
10 months ago
I think the rule created might specifically target the process that triggered the false positive, but I'm not entirely sure if it includes other machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
10 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of the Traps security product and how the rules work. I feel pretty confident in my knowledge of this topic, so I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
10 months ago
Based on the options, it seems like the rule will either stop EPM injection, stop it on the specific machine, exclude the endpoint from Traps protection, or include specific details about the prevention. I'll need to think through the implications of each of those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. What exactly is an "EPM-triggered false positive"? I'll need to make sure I understand that concept before I can confidently answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
10 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about the result of creating a rule from the Security Events > Preventions > Exploits tab. I think the key is understanding what that rule will do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
10 months ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the implications of each one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
10 months ago
Okay, the key here is understanding the purpose of the two parameters. The userCertWithKey parameter seems to be the important one, so I'll focus on that first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
10 months ago
This looks like a tricky SQL query. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about what each one is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
10 months ago
I recall discussing TableTabSelect in our last study group. It might just be a decoy option in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
10 months ago
I've seen this kind of issue before, and it's usually related to a dependency service being down or misconfigured. I'll start by checking the status of HDFS and the Metastore, since those seem like the most likely culprits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know host-based IDS systems monitor system activity, but I'm not totally clear on the specific types of things they look for. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
2 years ago
D is definitely the way to go. Precision is key when dealing with these security events. Don't want to be overzealous, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 years ago
I'm going with B. Seems like the most targeted approach to address the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
Tamar
2 years ago
Definitely, it's important to have specific rules in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
2 years ago
That's true, it's a targeted approach to address the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
2 years ago
Agreed, it focuses on stopping EPM injection into processes on the specific machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
2 years ago
I think B is the best option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
2 years ago
I agree with Angella, option D provides more information for better tracking and management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
2 years ago
But option D mentions including specific details which seems more comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
2 years ago
I think the result of the created rule is option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
2 years ago
D makes the most sense to me. Gotta love all the details in that rule, right? Bet the security team is thrilled about that.
upvoted 0 times
Ceola
2 years ago
Yeah, having all those details in the rule definitely helps the security team in understanding and managing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
2 years ago
D) The new rule will include the EPM that raised the prevention, the process that triggered the prevention, the machine on which the prevention was triggered, and a descriptive name for the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
2 years ago
B) The new rule stops all EPM injection into processes on the machine on which the prevention was triggered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
2 years ago
A) The new rule stops all EPM injection into the faulted process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Farrah
2 years ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is D. The rule should capture the details of the prevention, not just stop EPM injection in a broad way.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to have all that information in the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
2 years ago
I think the answer is D. It captures all the details of the prevention.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel