New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Endpoint-Associate Exam - Topic 1 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Endpoint-Associate exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Endpoint-Associate Questions]

Which two statements about file hashes are true? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Kris at Jan 28, 2025, 08:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Endpoint-Associate Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Wynell
3 months ago
I thought WildFire only dealt with malware, not app data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
3 months ago
D is definitely true, I've seen that in action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
4 months ago
I think B is correct too, makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
4 months ago
A is true, WildFire does that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
4 months ago
I might be mixing things up, but I think WildFire does get hashes from ESM Servers, though I can't remember the details clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
4 months ago
I feel like ESM Servers sending hashes to WildFire was mentioned, but I can't recall if it's specifically for application data or executables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
4 months ago
I think the Traps agent definitely caches hashes for executable files, that sounds familiar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
5 months ago
I remember something about WildFire and how it deals with malicious files, but I'm not sure if it populates the ESM Server's cache directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
5 months ago
Based on my understanding, the key things to focus on are the types of files (executable vs. application data) and where the hashes are being sent or cached. I think I've got a good handle on this now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the terminology here. Can someone explain what "WildFire" and "ESM Server" refer to in the context of this question?
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking which two statements are true, so I'll need to carefully evaluate each one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key differences between the file hash-related statements before selecting my answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure C and D are the right answers. ESM servers sending hashes of applications and executables to WildFire allows for comprehensive malware analysis and detection.
upvoted 0 times
Tonja
9 months ago
The Traps agent caching hashes of executable files is also crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
9 months ago
Yes, WildFire populates ESM Server's cache with hashes of files known to be malicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
10 months ago
ESM Servers sending hashes of application data files to WildFire does sound important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
10 months ago
I think you're right, C and D make sense for file hashes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
10 months ago
I'm not sure about A, but I think B is also true. The Traps agent caches hashes of executable files for which it has verdicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
11 months ago
I agree with you, Casandra. A and D make sense because ESM Servers send hashes of executable files to WildFire.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
11 months ago
A and B seem to be the correct options. The Traps agent caching hashes of executable files makes sense, and WildFire populating ESM's cache with known malicious hashes is a great way to leverage crowd-sourced intelligence.
upvoted 0 times
Teri
9 months ago
Exactly, A and B are the two true statements about file hashes. Good job on identifying them!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
10 months ago
So, ESM Servers do send hashes of executable files to WildFire. That's one of the correct statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
10 months ago
I agree, B is also true. The Traps agent caches hashes of executable files it has verdicts on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
10 months ago
Yes, A is correct. WildFire does populate ESM Server's cache with known malicious file hashes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casandra
11 months ago
I think A and D are true.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel