New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-DataCenter Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-DataCenter exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-DataCenter Questions]

XYZ Corporation has a legacy environment with asymmetric routing. The customer understands that Palo Alto Networks firewalls can support asymmetric routing with redundancy.

Which two features must be enabled to meet the customer's requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Georgeanna at Feb 12, 2025, 03:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-DataCenter Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Stephen
3 months ago
Not sure about HA active/active, seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
3 months ago
Definitely need virtual systems for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
3 months ago
Wait, can you really do asymmetric routing with these firewalls?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
4 months ago
I think policy-based forwarding is a must too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
4 months ago
Gotta enable HA active/active for redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
4 months ago
I recall that HA active/passive is a common configuration, but I’m not sure if it directly addresses the asymmetric routing requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
4 months ago
Policy-based forwarding sounds familiar, and I feel like it could be relevant here, especially for managing traffic in asymmetric setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
4 months ago
I think HA active/active might be one of the answers since it allows both firewalls to handle traffic simultaneously, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
5 months ago
I remember studying asymmetric routing, but I'm not entirely sure which features are specifically required for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
5 months ago
This question is testing our knowledge of Palo Alto's advanced networking features. I'll need to carefully consider each option to determine the best combination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
5 months ago
I'm confident I can solve this. The key is understanding how Palo Alto's high availability modes work with asymmetric routing. Let me double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Virtual systems and policy-based forwarding are the two features I need to enable to meet the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. Asymmetric routing and redundancy - I'll have to review the Palo Alto documentation to make sure I understand the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the Palo Alto features carefully to determine the right combination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
10 months ago
Virtual systems? More like virtual reality. Let's keep it real with the HA options and policy-based forwarding. Asymmetric routing, meet your match!
upvoted 0 times
Marta
9 months ago
B) HA active/active
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
9 months ago
A) Virtual systems
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francine
10 months ago
Ah, the classic asymmetric routing challenge. Policy-based forwarding is the key, and HA active/active will give that extra layer of redundancy. Solid choice!
upvoted 0 times
Ma
9 months ago
HA active/passive is another important feature to consider for failover scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
9 months ago
Virtual systems can also help in managing the traffic effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
10 months ago
Absolutely, HA active/active will provide the redundancy needed for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
10 months ago
Yes, policy-based forwarding is crucial for handling asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candra
10 months ago
Haha, HA active/passive? What is this, the 90s? Gotta keep up with the times, people. Policy-based forwarding is where it's at!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
10 months ago
Wait, I'm not sure about virtual systems. Isn't that more for segmentation? I'd go with the HA options to meet the redundancy requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Emiko
9 months ago
Virtual systems are more for segmentation, so I would stick with the HA options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
9 months ago
I think HA active/active and HA active/passive are the way to go for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
11 months ago
Hmm, I think Policy-based forwarding and HA active/active are the way to go. This will ensure redundancy and support for asymmetric routing in the legacy environment.
upvoted 0 times
Jennifer
9 months ago
Enabling these two features will ensure a smooth transition to support asymmetric routing in the legacy environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
9 months ago
The customer will benefit from the flexibility and redundancy provided by Policy-based forwarding and HA active/active.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
10 months ago
Virtual systems and HA active/passive are not the features needed for supporting asymmetric routing with redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
10 months ago
I agree, enabling Policy-based forwarding and HA active/active will meet the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mira
11 months ago
I'm not sure about HA active/active. I think HA active/passive might also be a valid option for meeting the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
11 months ago
I agree with Yen. Virtual systems and HA active/active provide the redundancy needed for asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
11 months ago
I think virtual systems and HA active/active must be enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel