U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Cortex Exam - Topic 1 Question 34 Discussion

What is the result of creating an exception from an exploit security event?
A) White lists the process from Wild Fire analysis and C) exempts administrators from generating alerts for 24 hours
B) exempts the user from generating events for 24 hours
D) disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involve

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Cortex Exam - Topic 1 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Cortex exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Cortex Questions]

What is the result of creating an exception from an exploit security event?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Emerson at Mar 01, 2023, 12:50 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Cortex Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shawnda
8 months ago
Nope, it actually exempts admins from alerts for 24 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
8 months ago
I heard it whitelists the process from Wild Fire analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
8 months ago
Definitely agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
8 months ago
I think it disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
8 months ago
I thought exemptions were more about user alerts, but now I'm confused about whether it's for admins or users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the answer might involve disabling alerts for a specific process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
8 months ago
I remember something about exemptions for users, but I can't recall if it's for 24 hours or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
9 months ago
I think creating an exception might relate to white listing, but I'm not sure if it's specifically about Wild Fire analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
9 months ago
I've done similar chart editing tasks before, so I feel confident I can tackle this one. The steps in option A look like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
9 months ago
I'm not too familiar with DHCPv6 guard, so I'll need to think this through carefully. Let me re-read the question and options to see if I can spot any clues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
9 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is A, as managed strategy is all about delivering value through incremental changes rather than big disruptive ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
1 year ago
Hmm, D it is. Though I'm curious if it also comes with a sternly worded email to the culprit.
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
11 months ago
D) disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involve
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
12 months ago
C) exempts administrators from generating alerts for 24 hours
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
12 months ago
B) exempts the user from generating events for 24 hours
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
1 year ago
A) White lists the process from Wild Fire analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
1 year ago
B and C are just avoiding the problem altogether. Exempting users or admins from alerts for 24 hours doesn't solve anything.
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
1 year ago
D) disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involved
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
A) White lists the process from Wild Fire analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Otis
1 year ago
A is a bit too lenient. White-listing the process doesn't really address the security issue at hand.
upvoted 0 times
Jin
1 year ago
A is a bit too lenient. White-listing the process doesn't really address the security issue at hand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
1 year ago
D) disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involved
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
1 year ago
B) exempts the user from generating events for 24 hours
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elden
1 year ago
D seems like the best option. Disabling the triggered EPM for the host and process involved is the logical response to an exploit security event.
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
1 year ago
User 4: D seems like the most effective solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, it's important to take action to prevent further security issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, disabling the triggered EPM makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
1 year ago
User 1: I think D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isabelle
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A) white lists the process from Wild Fire analysis could also be a possible result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
1 year ago
I agree with Art, option D makes sense because it helps in preventing further security breaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
1 year ago
I think the result of creating an exception from an exploit security event is D) disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involved.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel