New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Cortex Exam - Topic 1 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Cortex exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Cortex Questions]

What is the result of creating an exception from an exploit security event?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Emerson at Mar 01, 2023, 12:50 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Cortex Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shawnda
4 months ago
Nope, it actually exempts admins from alerts for 24 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
4 months ago
I heard it whitelists the process from Wild Fire analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
4 months ago
Definitely agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
4 months ago
I think it disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
5 months ago
I thought exemptions were more about user alerts, but now I'm confused about whether it's for admins or users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the answer might involve disabling alerts for a specific process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
5 months ago
I remember something about exemptions for users, but I can't recall if it's for 24 hours or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
5 months ago
I think creating an exception might relate to white listing, but I'm not sure if it's specifically about Wild Fire analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
5 months ago
I've done similar chart editing tasks before, so I feel confident I can tackle this one. The steps in option A look like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
5 months ago
I'm not too familiar with DHCPv6 guard, so I'll need to think this through carefully. Let me re-read the question and options to see if I can spot any clues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is A, as managed strategy is all about delivering value through incremental changes rather than big disruptive ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
9 months ago
Hmm, D it is. Though I'm curious if it also comes with a sternly worded email to the culprit.
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
8 months ago
D) disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involve
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
8 months ago
C) exempts administrators from generating alerts for 24 hours
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
8 months ago
B) exempts the user from generating events for 24 hours
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
9 months ago
A) White lists the process from Wild Fire analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
10 months ago
B and C are just avoiding the problem altogether. Exempting users or admins from alerts for 24 hours doesn't solve anything.
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
9 months ago
D) disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involved
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
9 months ago
A) White lists the process from Wild Fire analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Otis
10 months ago
A is a bit too lenient. White-listing the process doesn't really address the security issue at hand.
upvoted 0 times
Jin
8 months ago
A is a bit too lenient. White-listing the process doesn't really address the security issue at hand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
8 months ago
D) disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involved
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
9 months ago
B) exempts the user from generating events for 24 hours
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elden
11 months ago
D seems like the best option. Disabling the triggered EPM for the host and process involved is the logical response to an exploit security event.
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
10 months ago
User 4: D seems like the most effective solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
10 months ago
User 3: I agree, it's important to take action to prevent further security issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
10 months ago
User 2: Yeah, disabling the triggered EPM makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
10 months ago
User 1: I think D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isabelle
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A) white lists the process from Wild Fire analysis could also be a possible result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
11 months ago
I agree with Art, option D makes sense because it helps in preventing further security breaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
11 months ago
I think the result of creating an exception from an exploit security event is D) disables the triggered EPM for the host and process involved.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel