Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCSAE Topic 4 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCSAE exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 4
[All PCSAE Questions]

Which of these would be the most operationally efficient repository for moving XSOAR custom content from a development server to a production environment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jettie at Feb 11, 2025, 12:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PCSAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Della
1 months ago
Honestly, I'm just here for the jokes. But Option B does sound like the most 'operationally efficient' choice. *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Dannie
5 days ago
Let's go with Option B then, it's the most practical solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
6 days ago
Yeah, that would make the process much smoother and faster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
7 days ago
I think using a remote git repository is definitely the way to go for moving custom content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
19 days ago
I agree, Option B does seem like the best choice for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
29 days ago
User 2: Yeah, using a remote git repository would definitely streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 months ago
User 1: Option B does sound like the most 'operationally efficient' choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thomasena
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A) could also work well if managed properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
Cortex XSOAR public repo? Yeah, right. That's for the amateurs. Give me that private git repo any day!
upvoted 0 times
Mammie
1 months ago
Private git repo is definitely the way to go for moving custom content efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 months ago
B) Remote git repository specified in the dev-prod configuration parameters
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
2 months ago
I agree with Sylvie, using a remote git repository makes sense for smooth transition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
2 months ago
The dev server's default repo? Nah, that's just asking for trouble. Option B is clearly the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Thora
1 months ago
It just makes sense to have a separate repository for that kind of operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
1 months ago
I think option B is the most practical solution for moving custom content to production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
Yeah, it's definitely more secure and reliable than the default repo on the dev server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
2 months ago
I agree, using a remote git repository is the best choice for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
2 months ago
Remote git repo all the way, baby! Keeps everything nice and organized, no need to mess with local stuff.
upvoted 0 times
Theresia
1 months ago
Remote git repo is the best choice for sure, keeps everything in one place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
1 months ago
I prefer using a remote git repo as well, makes the process much smoother.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
1 months ago
Yeah, it's definitely the most organized option for moving custom content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
2 months ago
I agree, remote git repo is the way to go for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvie
2 months ago
I think option B) is the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice for moving XSOAR content from dev to prod. Gotta keep that version control on lock!
upvoted 0 times
Willard
2 months ago
Yeah, it's definitely the best way to ensure smooth transitions between environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
2 months ago
I agree, using a remote git repository for version control is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel