Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCNSA Topic 4 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCNSA exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 4
[All PCNSA Questions]

What can be achieved by disabling the Share Unused Address and Service Objects with Devices setting on Panorama?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A server profile identifies the external authentication service and instructs the firewall on how to connect to that authentication service and access the authentication credentials for your users. To configure SAML authentication, you must create a server profile and register the firewall and the identity provider (IdP) with each other. You can import a SAML metadata file from the IdP to automatically create a server profile and populate the connection, registration, and IdP certificate information.Reference:Configure SAML Authentication,Set Up SAML Authentication,Introduction to SAML


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jose
18 days ago
Wait, is this a trick question? What if the answer is 'All of the above'? I'm feeling lucky, so I'll go with that one.
upvoted 0 times
Antione
3 days ago
User 1: I think the answer is A) Increase the backup capacity for configuration backups per firewall
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashlyn
24 days ago
C seems the most logical to me. Reducing the sync time between HA pairs would be a big benefit.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
1 days ago
I think it also helps with reducing the number of objects pushed to a firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
4 days ago
I agree, reducing sync time is crucial for HA pairs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ben
1 months ago
Ha! Disabling that setting sounds like it would give you a lot more space for your cat videos on the backup storage. I'll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
Kirby
5 days ago
User3: A it is then, more room for cat videos!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
9 days ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. A sounds like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
20 days ago
User1: I think A makes sense, more space for backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanne
2 months ago
Hmm, maybe B? Increasing the per-firewall capacity for address and service objects could be useful, especially for larger networks.
upvoted 0 times
Barney
4 days ago
That's a good point. Let's review all the options before making a final choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
9 days ago
I'm not sure, but maybe we should consider the other options as well before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
10 days ago
Yeah, I agree. Having more capacity for address and service objects can be really beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
1 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. It would definitely help with larger networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renea
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. Disabling that setting would reduce the number of objects pushed to the firewall, which makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Jess
1 months ago
But what about C? Wouldn't reducing configuration and session synchronization time be beneficial as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
1 months ago
I agree, D makes sense because it would reduce the objects pushed to the firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think disabling it could reduce the number of objects pushed to a firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
2 months ago
I agree with Desmond. It makes sense that it would increase the per-firewall capacity for address and service objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
2 months ago
I think disabling that setting can increase the backup capacity for configuration backups per firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel