Palo Alto Networks PCCSE Exam - Topic 5 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCSE exam

Question #: 87
Topic #: 5

[All PCCSE Questions]

Which of the following is a reason for alert dismissal?

ASNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE

BALERT_RULE_ADDED

CPOLICY_UPDATED

DUSER_DELETED

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma/prisma-cloud/prisma-cloud-admin/manage-prisma-cloud-alerts/prisma-cloud-alert-resolution-reasons

In Prisma Cloud,POLICY_UPDATEDis a valid reason for the dismissal of an alert. This reason indicates that an alert can be dismissed if the policy that triggered the alert has been updated. When a policy is updated to no longer apply to certain resources or conditions, any open alerts that were generated based on the previous version of the policy may be dismissed as they are no longer relevant.

The other options, such as SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE, ALERT_RULE_ADDED, and USER_DELETED, are not standard reasons for the dismissal of an alert in Prisma Cloud. SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE refers to the temporary suspension of an alert, ALERT_RULE_ADDED is related to the creation of a new alert rule, and USER_DELETED would pertain to the removal of a user account, not directly to alert dismissal.

by Vonda at Sep 13, 2024, 01:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PCCSE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alfreda

3 months ago

Not sure about D, sounds a bit off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

3 months ago

C is a valid reason for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

3 months ago

Wait, can a user really be deleted?

upvoted 0 times

...

Julianna

4 months ago

B makes sense too, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

4 months ago

I think it's definitely A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

4 months ago

I vaguely recall that policy updates might affect alerts, but I can't remember if they lead to dismissal or just changes in behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

4 months ago

I'm really uncertain about this one. I thought snoozed alerts just paused them, not dismissed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaun

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question last week, and I feel like user deletion could definitely lead to an alert dismissal. So maybe D?

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

5 months ago

I think I remember something about alert rules being a reason for dismissal, but I'm not entirely sure if it's option B or C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

5 months ago

This seems like a tricky one, but I think I've got a strategy. I'll read through the options and try to think about the different ways an alert could be dismissed. That should help me narrow it down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure I fully understand the context or what the different options mean. I'll have to review my notes and see if I can figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tijuana

5 months ago

Okay, let's see here. I'm guessing it's probably something to do with the alert itself being closed or removed, rather than a policy or user change. I'll go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alisha

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe I can eliminate a couple of the options that don't seem as relevant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

5 months ago

This looks like a straightforward multiple-choice question. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one is the most likely reason for alert dismissal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harris

5 months ago

I'll carefully read the statement. It says 'not from theft', so I need to think about other causes like damage or miscounting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

1 year ago

A) SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE, for sure. Although, I'm kind of curious what would happen if you tried to dismiss an alert by deleting the user. 'Sorry, can't see that alert anymore, I'm not here!'

upvoted 0 times

...