New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PCCSE Exam - Topic 5 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCSE exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 5
[All PCCSE Questions]

An administrator sees that a runtime audit has been generated for a host. The audit message is:

''Service postfix attempted to obtain capability SHELL by executing /bin/sh /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix- script.stop. Low severity audit, event is automatically added to the runtime model''

Which runtime host policy rule is the root cause for this runtime audit?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

View users who enabled console access with both access keys and passwords: config from cloud.resource where api.name = 'aws-iam-get-credential-report' AND json.rule = access_key_1_active is true or access_key_2_active is true and password_enabled is true https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma/prisma-cloud/prisma-cloud-rql-reference/rql-reference/config-query/config-query-examples


by Glory at Jul 16, 2024, 01:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PCCSE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Melodie
3 months ago
Custom rules wouldn't trigger this, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
3 months ago
Wait, why is postfix trying to get shell access? That's weird.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
3 months ago
Not so sure about that, could be D too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
4 months ago
I think it's definitely option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
4 months ago
Sounds like a default rule to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the specifics, but I recall that default rules often cover alerts on capabilities. Maybe that’s the key here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
4 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice exam where we looked at similar audit messages. I think the answer could be related to suspicious runtime behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the default rule that alerts on capabilities could be the right answer. It seems to fit the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
5 months ago
I remember we discussed runtime audits in class, and I think this might relate to capabilities being monitored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. The audit message doesn't seem to mention anything about file integrity or networking, so I'm not sure those would be the root cause. I'm going to go with the default rule that alerts on capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The audit message says it's a low severity event, so I don't think it's a custom rule with specific configuration. I'm leaning towards option C - the default rule that alerts on capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
5 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. The audit message mentions a capability issue with the postfix service, so I'm thinking it's probably related to a default rule that alerts on capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the default rule that alerts on suspicious runtime behavior is the most likely answer. The audit message indicates a potential security issue, so that rule seems the most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Brainstorming is all about generating ideas without judgment, so option A sounds right. It's not about eliminating ideas, which is what the other options seem to be describing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I've heard about class imbalance issues before, but I'm not sure which of these solutions is the most appropriate. I'll need to review my notes on handling imbalanced datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
9 months ago
I'm just going to go with C) Default rule that alerts on capabilities. Seems like the safest bet, and who knows, maybe the exam writers were feeling generous and decided to make this one a giveaway. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
King
8 months ago
Let's hope we're right about this one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
8 months ago
I agree, default rules are usually there for a reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
8 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's better to go with the default rule in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
9 months ago
I think C) Default rule that alerts on capabilities is the most likely answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samuel
10 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher! I bet the exam writers were chuckling to themselves when they came up with this one. Anyway, I'm going to go with D) Default rule that alerts on suspicious runtime behavior. Seems like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
10 months ago
Ah, I see! The audit message specifically mentions the postfix-script.stop file, which is likely a command used by the postfix service. So, the correct answer must be C) Default rule that alerts on capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Paris
9 months ago
Exactly, the audit message clearly points to the postfix service attempting to obtain a specific capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
9 months ago
So, the default rule that alerts on capabilities would be triggered in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
9 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. The postfix service was trying to obtain the SHELL capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odelia
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The audit message doesn't mention anything about file integrity or networking, so A) and B) don't seem to be the right answers. I'll have to think about this a little more.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardine
9 months ago
That makes sense, the audit message does mention the service attempting to obtain a capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
9 months ago
I think the answer might be C) Default rule that alerts on capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luz
11 months ago
The runtime audit message suggests that the postfix service tried to obtain the SHELL capability, which is a suspicious runtime behavior. So, I think the correct answer is D) Default rule that alerts on suspicious runtime behavior.
upvoted 0 times
Thurman
10 months ago
Yes, having proper runtime host policies can help prevent security breaches and unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
10 months ago
It's important to have rules in place to catch these kinds of behaviors before they cause any harm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
10 months ago
I think the default rule that alerts on suspicious runtime behavior is the root cause for this audit message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
10 months ago
I agree, the postfix service trying to obtain the SHELL capability does seem suspicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marguerita
11 months ago
I agree with Delisa, it seems like the default rule for capabilities is the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
11 months ago
I believe it could be a default rule that alerts on capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
11 months ago
I think the root cause is a custom rule for file integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel