Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCCSE Topic 1 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCSE exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 1
[All PCCSE Questions]

Which intensity setting for anomaly alerts is used for the measurement of 100 events over 30 days?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/blogs/what-is-changing-for-ci-cd-plugins/ba-p/461676

Prisma Cloud has announced changes to its CI/CD plugins due to the acquisition of Bridgecrew1.The existing IaC functionality in Prisma Cloud will be replaced by a Prisma ''cloud code security'' (CCS) module that delivers Bridgecrew integration in Prisma Cloud1.As part of this change, several CI/CD plugins that Prisma Cloud currently uses will either be replaced or modified1.

According to the information from the link, bothCheckovandCircleCIare listed as integrations that will switch to the Prisma ''cloud code security'' (CCS) module1.Checkov is an open-source command-line interface (CLI) utility that includes more than 750 predefined policies and supports custom policies1.CircleCI is a continuous integration and continuous delivery platform1.


by Rueben at Jan 11, 2025, 09:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PCCSE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ngoc
2 months ago
Wait, so we're measuring intensity in 'events per month'? Shouldn't it be 'beeps per minute' or something more dramatic?
upvoted 0 times
Jarvis
2 months ago
C) Low
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
2 months ago
B) Medium
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
2 months ago
A) High
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Goldie
3 months ago
Ooh, I'm feeling lucky. Let's go with D) Very High! Anomalies love the drama, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
1 months ago
User 3: Yeah, I think Medium would be a better choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, maybe we should go with B) Medium for a more balanced approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 months ago
User 1: I think D) Very High is a bit too extreme for 100 events over 30 days.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verdell
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with B) Medium. Feels like a nice middle ground, you know? Not too low, not too high.
upvoted 0 times
Lavonna
2 months ago
User 3: I would go with C) Low, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Not too intense, not too relaxed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
2 months ago
User 1: I think B) Medium is a good choice. It's balanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denise
3 months ago
I dunno, 'Very High' seems a bit excessive for only 100 events. That's gotta be the wrong answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
3 months ago
C) Low seems like the right choice here. 100 events over 30 days is a pretty low intensity, so the 'Low' setting makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
1 months ago
D) Very High
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
2 months ago
C) Low
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
2 months ago
B) Medium
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
3 months ago
A) High
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Detra
3 months ago
But wouldn't High be better to ensure we don't miss any important anomalies?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe Medium would be more appropriate for that measurement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
4 months ago
I think the intensity setting should be High for 100 events over 30 days.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel