New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks PCCSE Exam - Topic 1 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCSE exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 1
[All PCCSE Questions]

Which ''kind'' of Kubernetes object is configured to ensure that Defender is acting as the admission controller?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Dorathy
4 months ago
Totally agree, A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not D? PodSecurityPolicies seem relevant too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
4 months ago
A and C are both related, but A is the right one for admission control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
4 months ago
I thought it was C, ValidatingWebhookConfiguration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
4 months ago
It's definitely A, MutatingWebhookConfiguration!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
5 months ago
PodSecurityPolicies don't seem right for this question. I think it's definitely between the webhook configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards ValidatingWebhookConfiguration as well, but I could be mixing it up with something else we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about admission controllers, and I feel like MutatingWebhookConfiguration was mentioned too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
5 months ago
I think it might be ValidatingWebhookConfiguration, but I'm not entirely sure. We did cover admission controllers in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. For a custom approval process, I'd go with option D and create a new workflow in the workflow editor. That should give me the flexibility to handle the unique requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. I know some of these work in the liver or pancreas, but I'm not sure which ones specifically target fat tissue. I'll have to review my notes to refresh my memory on the mechanisms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
5 months ago
Option C looks promising - replicating the catalog from the original sandbox could be an efficient way to get the same setup. I'll investigate that further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions troubleshooting the deployment failure, so I'm not sure if `service.state` or `service.serialize()` would be the best options to try. I might start with `service.get_logs()` to see if that provides more insight into the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know we need to use a JavaScript object to handle the forward and back functionality, but I'm not totally sure which one is the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel