Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Pro Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

A network administrator obtains Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Advanced DNS Security subscriptions for edge NGFWs and is setting up security profiles. Which step should be included in the initial configuration of the Advanced DNS Security service?
C) Configure DNS Security signature policy settings to sinkhole malicious DNS queries.
A) Create a decryption policy rule to decrypt DNS-over-TLS / port 853 traffic.
B) Create overrides for all company owned FQDNs.
D) Enable Advanced Threat Prevention with default settings and only focus on high-risk traffic.

Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Pro Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's NetSec-Pro exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All NetSec-Pro Questions]

A network administrator obtains Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Advanced DNS Security subscriptions for edge NGFWs and is setting up security profiles. Which step should be included in the initial configuration of the Advanced DNS Security service?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Advanced DNS Security uses a signature policy to sinkhole malicious DNS queries and prevent them from resolving.

''The DNS Security service integrates with Anti-Spyware profiles, and you must configure signature policy settings to sinkhole malicious queries. This proactively stops traffic to known malicious domains.''

(Source: Configure DNS Security)

Sinkholing ensures that DNS queries to malicious FQDNs are redirected to a safe IP, preventing compromise.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rosina
9 months ago
I think enabling Advanced Threat Prevention first makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
9 months ago
Creating overrides for FQDNs is also important, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
10 months ago
I agree, option C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
10 months ago
Wait, are we really sure about that? Seems too straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
10 months ago
You definitely need to configure DNS Security signature policy settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
10 months ago
I recall that decrypting DNS-over-TLS traffic is important, but I’m not confident if that’s the very first thing we should do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like enabling Advanced Threat Prevention with default settings might not be the best initial step. We should be more proactive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about needing to create overrides for FQDNs. Is that really necessary right away?
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
11 months ago
I think the first step should be to configure the DNS Security signature policy settings. That seems crucial for blocking malicious queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by this one. The question is specifically about the initial configuration of the Advanced DNS Security service, but some of the options seem to be more about the broader security setup, like the decryption policy and enabling Advanced Threat Prevention. I'm not sure if those would be the right first steps. I think I'll need to review the Palo Alto documentation more carefully to make sure I understand the proper sequence of steps for setting up the Advanced DNS Security service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about the initial configuration of the Advanced DNS Security service, so I think the answer is probably either B or C. Creating overrides for company-owned FQDNs or configuring the DNS Security signature policy settings both seem like logical first steps to me. I'll need to double-check the details, but I'm feeling pretty confident about those two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is specifically asking about the initial configuration, so I'm not sure if creating a decryption policy or enabling Advanced Threat Prevention would be the right first step. I'm leaning towards either option B or C, but I'll need to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
12 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the initial configuration of the Advanced DNS Security service, so I'd go with option C - configuring the DNS Security signature policy settings to sinkhole malicious DNS queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 year ago
Haha, this exam is really testing our DNS security knowledge. I bet the network admin who set this up is laughing at us right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 year ago
A is definitely not it. Decrypting DNS-over-TLS traffic? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 year ago
B looks interesting, but I'm not sure overriding all company FQDNs is the initial configuration step. Hmm, tough one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
1 year ago
D seems like the easiest option, but I doubt that's the correct answer. We need to focus on the Advanced DNS Security service specifically.
upvoted 0 times
Delfina
1 year ago
A) Create a decryption policy rule to decrypt DNS-over-TLS / port 853 traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 year ago
C) Configure DNS Security signature policy settings to sinkhole malicious DNS queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
A) Create a decryption policy rule to decrypt DNS-over-TLS / port 853 traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristal
1 year ago
I agree with Johnson, C seems like the best option to protect the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
1 year ago
But setting up sinkholing for malicious DNS queries is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
1 year ago
I think C is the right answer. Sinkholing malicious DNS queries is key to the Advanced DNS Security service.
upvoted 0 times
Trina
1 year ago
Yes, it helps prevent users from accessing malicious websites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
1 year ago
I agree, sinkholing malicious DNS queries is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
1 year ago
Yes, that's a good point. It's important to have a comprehensive approach to DNS security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
I think we should also consider creating overrides for company owned FQDNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
1 year ago
I agree, sinkholing malicious DNS queries is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristy
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
1 year ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel