Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

OutSystems Associate-Reactive-Developer Exam - Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

How is the data fetched by an Aggregate bound to a Table or a List widget?
A) By setting the Source property of the widget to the output of the Aggregate.
B) By creating a Screen Action that programmatically assigns the widget to the data fetched by the Aggregate.
C) The binding is done automatically since the Aggregate is in the scope of the Screen.
D) By adding an Expression inside the widget that refers to an attribute of the data fetched by the Aggregate.

OutSystems Associate-Reactive-Developer Exam - Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for OutSystems's Associate-Reactive-Developer exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 1
[All Associate-Reactive-Developer Questions]

How is the data fetched by an Aggregate bound to a Table or a List widget?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Selma at Jul 29, 2023, 12:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Associate-Reactive-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Krystina
10 months ago
Yeah, I've always used A for this kind of binding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
10 months ago
Wait, is D really a thing? That sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
10 months ago
I disagree, B sounds too complicated for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
10 months ago
I think C makes more sense, it's automatic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
10 months ago
It's definitely A, you set the Source property.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
11 months ago
I feel like creating a Screen Action to assign the widget to the data is a bit overcomplicated, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenia
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about using an Expression inside the widget to refer to the data. That sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
11 months ago
I remember something about the binding being automatic when the Aggregate is in scope, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
11 months ago
I think the data is bound by setting the Source property of the widget, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
11 months ago
This looks like a valuation problem, so I'll need to calculate the maximum price that Company E should offer based on the information provided. I'll need to consider the current earnings, growth potential, and risk profile of the two companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I was thinking maybe the CA ID number, but I'm not 100% confident on that. I'll have to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Management is asking for a visual diagram of the resources that will be used, so the correct answer has to be C - Resource breakdown structure. That's the chart that breaks down all the different resources, equipment, materials, and personnel required for the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about XSLT, which is used to transform XML data. I'll review my notes on the Data Model Transformation pattern to make sure I understand the context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
1 year ago
If the Aggregate ever gets lost, it can just 'Aggregate' itself back home!
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
1 year ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Creating a Screen Action to programmatically assign the widget to the data fetched by the Aggregate sounds like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll go with option D and add an Expression inside the widget that refers to an attribute of the data fetched by the Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
Alline
1 year ago
Great choice, option D is the correct way to bind data to a widget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
1 year ago
That makes sense, it's a common way to fetch data from an Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
1 year ago
I agree, adding an Expression inside the widget sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
1 year ago
I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vashti
1 year ago
I was a bit confused by this question, but I'm pretty sure the answer is C. The binding should be done automatically since the Aggregate is in the scope of the Screen.
upvoted 0 times
Audra
1 year ago
I agree with you, it's definitely C. The binding is done automatically since the Aggregate is in the scope of the Screen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 year ago
No, I believe it's D. By adding an Expression inside the widget that refers to an attribute of the data fetched by the Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
1 year ago
C) The binding is done automatically since the Aggregate is in the scope of the Screen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
1 year ago
I think the answer is A. By setting the Source property of the widget to the output of the Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
1 year ago
B) By creating a Screen Action that programmatically assigns the widget to the data fetched by the Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
1 year ago
A) By setting the Source property of the widget to the output of the Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearline
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is option A. Setting the Source property of the widget to the output of the Aggregate is the easiest and most straightforward way to bind the data fetched by the Aggregate to a Table or List widget.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
1 year ago
Agreed, it's the most efficient way to bind the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
1 year ago
It definitely simplifies the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
1 year ago
I think so too, setting the Source property makes it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
1 year ago
I agree, option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
1 year ago
Agreed, no need for extra steps with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
1 year ago
It's definitely the easiest way to bind the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
I think so too, setting the Source property makes it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
1 year ago
I agree, option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herschel
1 year ago
I feel like the binding is done automatically since the Aggregate is in the scope of the Screen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 year ago
I believe the correct way is by adding an Expression inside the widget that refers to an attribute of the data fetched by the Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 year ago
I think the data is fetched by setting the Source property of the widget to the output of the Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
I feel like the binding is done automatically since the Aggregate is in the scope of the Screen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
1 year ago
I believe the correct way is by adding an Expression inside the widget that refers to an attribute of the data fetched by the Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
1 year ago
I think the data is fetched by setting the Source property of the widget to the output of the Aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel