Regarding the Delete Rule property, which of the following options does not guarantee referential integrity?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium Associate-Reactive-Developer Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
PE
Peter
11 months ago
I thought Delete would be the one!
TA
Tawna
11 months ago
Protect is the way to go for integrity.
MA
Marleen
12 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds off.
DE
Demetra
12 months ago
Totally agree, that's a no-brainer!
KI
Kiley
12 months ago
Option A, Ignore, doesn't guarantee referential integrity.
IL
Ilona
1 year ago
I’m confused about "Protect" and "Delete"—I thought both were meant to ensure referential integrity.
CY
Cyril
1 year ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, and "Delete" was definitely not the right choice.
NO
Nobuko
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about "Protect" being used to maintain integrity.
MY
My
1 year ago
I think the answer might be "Ignore" since it sounds like it wouldn't enforce any rules.
FR
Frank
1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. The key is to focus on the part about not needing the Workspace ONE Access Connector, which rules out a few options.
AH
Ahmad
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The real-time update requirement makes me think OData might be the way to go, but I'm not sure if that's the most efficient option for a large dataset that doesn't change often.
BE
Benton
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the options here. Dominance, intensity, and entitlement don't really seem to fit the description. I'm leaning towards A, but I want to double-check my understanding.