Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

OutSystems Associate-Reactive-Developer Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Regarding the Delete Rule property, which of the following options does not guarantee referential integrity?
A) Ignore
B) Delete
C) Protect

OutSystems Associate-Reactive-Developer Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for OutSystems's Associate-Reactive-Developer exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 1
[All Associate-Reactive-Developer Questions]

Regarding the Delete Rule property, which of the following options does not guarantee referential integrity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Sarah at May 24, 2023, 09:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Associate-Reactive-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Peter
7 months ago
I thought Delete would be the one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
7 months ago
Protect is the way to go for integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
7 months ago
Totally agree, that's a no-brainer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
7 months ago
Option A, Ignore, doesn't guarantee referential integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
8 months ago
I’m confused about "Protect" and "Delete"—I thought both were meant to ensure referential integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
8 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, and "Delete" was definitely not the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about "Protect" being used to maintain integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
8 months ago
I think the answer might be "Ignore" since it sounds like it wouldn't enforce any rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
8 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. The key is to focus on the part about not needing the Workspace ONE Access Connector, which rules out a few options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The real-time update requirement makes me think OData might be the way to go, but I'm not sure if that's the most efficient option for a large dataset that doesn't change often.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
8 months ago
I'm a little confused by the options here. Dominance, intensity, and entitlement don't really seem to fit the description. I'm leaning towards A, but I want to double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel