New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OutSystems Architecture-Specialist-11 Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for OutSystems's Architecture-Specialist-11 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All Architecture-Specialist-11 Questions]

What does NOT happen due to a lack of architecture concerns?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lacey
4 months ago
Not sure about C, seems like it could be managed better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
4 months ago
Wait, are we really saying poor abstraction isn't a big deal?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
4 months ago
Can't believe people underestimate tech debt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
4 months ago
I think D is the real issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
4 months ago
A is definitely a problem with legacy systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
4 months ago
Poor service abstraction sounds like a direct result of not having clear architecture guidelines, so D seems like it could be a consequence as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
5 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think unmanageable dependencies definitely arise from poor architecture, which makes me lean towards C as a possible answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think tech debt is something that accumulates when architecture isn't prioritized, so B could be a valid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
5 months ago
I remember discussing how inflexible legacy systems can really slow down business changes, so I think A might be a consequence of not addressing architecture concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. A lack of architecture concerns would not lead to AI Mentor raising technical debt, since that's more of an architectural consideration. The other options all seem like valid consequences of not thinking about architecture, so I'm going to select B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking what does NOT happen due to a lack of architecture concerns, so the answer must be the one that is not a consequence of poor architecture. I'm going to go with B, since the other options seem like clear issues that can arise from not considering architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is B, since a lack of architecture concerns would not lead to AI Mentor raising technical debt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. I'm not sure if the correct answer is B, since a lack of architecture concerns could also lead to the other issues mentioned, like inflexible legacy systems or unmanageable dependencies. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, but I'm not totally clear on the nuances between them. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
5 months ago
I believe Proposal B is the right answer since its PI suggests a positive value. I feel like I saw a similar question on this in practice tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
5 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I know the different contract types have specific characteristics, but I'm having trouble keeping them straight. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
2 years ago
Ooh, that's a good point, Melvin. I was actually leaning towards option A, 'Inflexible and slow-moving legacy systems,' as the one that doesn't necessarily happen. I mean, you can have inflexible legacy systems even with a solid architecture, right? It's just a pain to maintain those things, architecture or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that, Adela. I was thinking that 'Poor service abstraction' (option D) might be the one that doesn't necessarily happen from a lack of architecture concerns. I mean, you could still have crummy service abstraction even if you have a decent architecture in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
2 years ago
Hah, tell me about it, Audra. This is why we need a 'none of the above' option sometimes. Or maybe a 'all of the above' option, just to keep us on our toes. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Halina
2 years ago
D) Poor service abstraction : Business concepts not correctly isolated, business rules tend to be spread over different systems and little to no code reuse
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
2 years ago
C) Unmanageable dependencies : System not isolated from each other. Updating or replacing a system has a cascade/snowball effect on other systems
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
2 years ago
B) Tech Debt : AI Mentor will raise architectural tech debt such as cyclic dependency and side to side dependency
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
2 years ago
A) Inflexible and slow-moving legacy systems : adapting legacy systems to business changes may be difficult. Changes in complex and inflexible systems can take a long time
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audra
2 years ago
Ugh, you guys are making my head spin. This is why I hate multiple-choice questions - there are always so many viable options! *sighs* I guess I'll just have to go with my gut on this one and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel