I practiced a question similar to this, and I think unmanageable dependencies definitely arise from poor architecture, which makes me lean towards C as a possible answer.
I remember discussing how inflexible legacy systems can really slow down business changes, so I think A might be a consequence of not addressing architecture concerns.
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. A lack of architecture concerns would not lead to AI Mentor raising technical debt, since that's more of an architectural consideration. The other options all seem like valid consequences of not thinking about architecture, so I'm going to select B.
Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking what does NOT happen due to a lack of architecture concerns, so the answer must be the one that is not a consequence of poor architecture. I'm going to go with B, since the other options seem like clear issues that can arise from not considering architecture.
This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is B, since a lack of architecture concerns would not lead to AI Mentor raising technical debt.
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. I'm not sure if the correct answer is B, since a lack of architecture concerns could also lead to the other issues mentioned, like inflexible legacy systems or unmanageable dependencies. I'll need to think this through carefully.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, but I'm not totally clear on the nuances between them. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through carefully.
I'm not totally sure about this one. I know the different contract types have specific characteristics, but I'm having trouble keeping them straight. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through the options.
Ooh, that's a good point, Melvin. I was actually leaning towards option A, 'Inflexible and slow-moving legacy systems,' as the one that doesn't necessarily happen. I mean, you can have inflexible legacy systems even with a solid architecture, right? It's just a pain to maintain those things, architecture or not.
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that, Adela. I was thinking that 'Poor service abstraction' (option D) might be the one that doesn't necessarily happen from a lack of architecture concerns. I mean, you could still have crummy service abstraction even if you have a decent architecture in place.
Hah, tell me about it, Audra. This is why we need a 'none of the above' option sometimes. Or maybe a 'all of the above' option, just to keep us on our toes. *chuckles*
D) Poor service abstraction : Business concepts not correctly isolated, business rules tend to be spread over different systems and little to no code reuse
A) Inflexible and slow-moving legacy systems : adapting legacy systems to business changes may be difficult. Changes in complex and inflexible systems can take a long time
Ugh, you guys are making my head spin. This is why I hate multiple-choice questions - there are always so many viable options! *sighs* I guess I'll just have to go with my gut on this one and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Lacey
4 months agoLeanora
4 months agoEva
4 months agoRodolfo
4 months agoMajor
4 months agoMelynda
4 months agoOliva
5 months agoGlory
5 months agoLeah
5 months agoLanie
5 months agoMartina
5 months agoCathrine
5 months agoElza
5 months agoSherell
5 months agoRemedios
5 months agoVincenza
5 months agoNguyet
2 years agoMelvin
2 years agoAdela
2 years agoHalina
2 years agoLucina
2 years agoChau
2 years agoFreeman
2 years agoAudra
2 years ago