Exactly, I was thinking the same thing. This question is trying to trick us, but I'm confident A is the right answer. Unless, of course, the architects were 'abstractly challenged' when designing the system.
Definitely, a good architecture helps reduce costs by improving efficiency and maintainability. And it also helps support planning and risk mitigation, so B and C seem like the benefits here.
I agree with you there. A well-designed architecture should provide a clear separation of concerns and promote modularity, which is the opposite of poor service abstraction.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm pretty sure the correct answer is A) Poor service abstraction. A well-defined architecture should actually improve service abstraction, not make it poor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Junita
8 days agoWendell
9 days agoTammara
10 days agoLaticia
11 days ago