Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

OutSystems Architecture-Specialist-11 Exam - Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Which of the following is a benefit of having good architecture?
B) Unmanageable dependencies
A) Poor service abstraction
C) Manages complexity
D) Slow-moving legacy systems

OutSystems Architecture-Specialist-11 Exam - Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for OutSystems's Architecture-Specialist-11 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 1
[All Architecture-Specialist-11 Questions]

Which of the following is a benefit of having good architecture?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Charlesetta at May 20, 2024, 04:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Architecture-Specialist-11 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Willard
6 months ago
Good architecture should avoid slow systems, for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
7 months ago
Surprised that D is even an option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
7 months ago
Wait, are we really considering A and B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
7 months ago
I agree, managing complexity is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
7 months ago
C is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
7 months ago
Unmanageable dependencies seem like a downside, so I guess that rules out option B for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
8 months ago
I feel like poor service abstraction could be a consequence of bad architecture, but I can't recall if it’s a benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
8 months ago
I remember a practice question about architecture benefits, and managing complexity was definitely one of the key points.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
8 months ago
I think good architecture helps manage complexity, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
8 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. Good architecture is all about organizing and structuring systems to make them more manageable. I'm pretty sure the right answer here is C - "Manages complexity".
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Good architecture should help manage complexity, so I'm leaning towards C. The other options don't seem to capture the key benefits as well. I'll go with C and see how it goes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'm trying to think through the different options, but I'm not totally sure which one is the best benefit of good architecture. I might need to review my notes on this topic again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
8 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C - "Manages complexity".
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
8 months ago
This seems straightforward. Based on the total cost concept, I'd say the correct answer is inventory carrying costs, as that's a major factor in selecting a transportation mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know that l-VPLS is a type of VPLS, so it's likely related to the SDP configurations supported in a VPLS. I'll try to eliminate the options that don't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
8 months ago
This question seems familiar—I think it was similar to the practice questions we did about cloud solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
1 year ago
C is the right choice. You know what they say, 'An architect a day keeps the technical debt away.'
upvoted 0 times
Teri
1 year ago
I agree. Poor service abstraction and unmanageable dependencies can lead to a lot of issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 year ago
Definitely! Good architecture helps manage complexity and avoid slow-moving legacy systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
1 year ago
C is the right choice. You know what they say, 'An architect a day keeps the technical debt away.'
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettye
1 year ago
C is the clear winner here. Imagine trying to work on a system with poor architecture - it's a nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
1 year ago
Trying to work with poor architecture can be a real headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
1 year ago
Absolutely, it makes everything much easier to understand and work with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
1 year ago
I agree, good architecture definitely helps in managing complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
1 year ago
C) Manages complexity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaunna
1 year ago
I would have to go with C as well. Proper architecture is the key to avoiding unmanageable messes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
I think poor service abstraction and unmanageable dependencies are the drawbacks of not having good architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 year ago
Definitely C. Good architecture is all about managing complexity and making systems more maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
Shanice
1 year ago
C. Good architecture is all about managing complexity and making systems more maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
1 year ago
D) Slow-moving legacy systems
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
1 year ago
C) Manages complexity
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
1 year ago
B) Unmanageable dependencies
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
1 year ago
A) Poor service abstraction
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teresita
1 year ago
I agree with Donette, having good architecture helps in managing complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
1 year ago
C) Manages complexity
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel