Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

OutSystems Architecture-Specialist-11 Exam - Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

ISO/IEC 25010:2011 adds two more aspect to ISO/IEC 9126:1991. Which of the below is not part of it?
B) Security : Security ensure software solutions can protect information and data
A) Compatibility : Compatibility was also added as a way to ensure that a piece of software can work together with other systems
C) Integration : Integration to allow data exchange with other software

OutSystems Architecture-Specialist-11 Exam - Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for OutSystems's Architecture-Specialist-11 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 1
[All Architecture-Specialist-11 Questions]

ISO/IEC 25010:2011 adds two more aspect to ISO/IEC 9126:1991. Which of the below is not part of it?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Eve at Apr 19, 2024, 09:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Architecture-Specialist-11 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rhea
8 months ago
I agree, security is super important, but I thought it was always included!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
8 months ago
Wait, is integration really not part of ISO/IEC 25010? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
8 months ago
Integration seems like a no-brainer for modern software!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
9 months ago
I thought security was already covered in earlier standards?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
9 months ago
Compatibility was definitely added, that's a fact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think compatibility is correct, but I might be mixing it up with security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
9 months ago
Integration sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it was part of the original ISO/IEC 9126 or if it was added later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like security was definitely emphasized in the newer standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
9 months ago
I remember studying ISO/IEC 25010, and I think compatibility was one of the new aspects added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
10 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about the changes from 9126 to 25010. I believe the aspect that was not part of the original standard is Integration. I'll mark that as my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
10 months ago
Integration seems like the most likely answer that was not part of the original ISO/IEC 9126:1991 standard. I'll go with that unless I can think of a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. I know Security was added, but I'm not sure about the other new aspect. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is not Compatibility, since that was one of the new aspects added in ISO/IEC 25010:2011.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. Operational risk is definitely about managing day-to-day safety and health risks for employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
10 months ago
I remember there was a practice question similar to this, and it emphasized needing both a voice license and possibly a multimedia license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
10 months ago
Hmm, this one seems pretty straightforward. I think I'll go with option B - adding 'return false;' after the alert call on line 7 to prevent the form from submitting if the username is less than 6 characters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
1 year ago
Compatibility? What is this, a compatibility test for software? Seriously though, I think C) Integration is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Roselle
1 year ago
C) Integration: Integration to allow data exchange with other software
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
1 year ago
B) Security: Security ensure software solutions can protect information and data
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
1 year ago
A) Compatibility: Compatibility was also added as a way to ensure that a piece of software can work together with other systems
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Argelia
1 year ago
Security? Really? That's so basic, it can't be the answer. I'm going with C) Integration, it's the only one that sounds like a new addition.
upvoted 0 times
Billy
1 year ago
User4: I think Integration makes sense as a new addition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
User3: Compatibility is also a key aspect to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
1 year ago
User2: I agree, I'm leaning towards C) Integration as the new addition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 year ago
User1: I think B) Security is too basic to be the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cammy
1 year ago
Haha, this is a classic case of trying to trick the test-takers. I'm going with C) Integration, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
1 year ago
Wait, what? I thought 'Integration' was one of the new aspects added. This question is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
Yuki
1 year ago
A) Compatibility : Compatibility was also added as a way to ensure that a piece of software can work together with other systems
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
1 year ago
B) Security : Security ensure software solutions can protect information and data
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anabel
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is C) Integration. ISO/IEC 25010:2011 added 'Reliability' and 'Maintainability' as new aspects, not 'Integration'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
Actually, I believe the answer is C) Integration. Integration was added in ISO/IEC 25010:2011 for data exchange.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 year ago
I agree with Lindsey, Security is not part of ISO/IEC 25010:2011.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) Security.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel