Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle 1Z0-1127-25 Exam - Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1127-25 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-1127-25 Questions]

Which statement accurately reflects the differences between these approaches in terms of the number of parameters modified and the type of data used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation=

Fine-tuning typically involves updating all parameters of an LLM using labeled, task-specific data to adapt it to a specific task, which is computationally expensive. Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT), such as methods like LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation), updates only a small subset of parameters (often newly added ones) while still using labeled, task-specific data, making it more efficient. Option C correctly captures this distinction. Option A is wrong because continuous pretraining uses unlabeled data and isn't task-specific. Option B is incorrect as PEFT and Soft Prompting don't modify all parameters, and Soft Prompting typically uses labeled examples indirectly. Option D is inaccurate because continuous pretraining modifies parameters, while SoftPrompting doesn't.

: OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely discusses Fine-tuning and PEFT under model customization techniques.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Galen
3 months ago
Wait, so Soft Prompting doesn't change any parameters? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
3 months ago
I think A is misleading; not all parameters are modified in every case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
4 months ago
Totally agree with C, it’s the most accurate description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
4 months ago
D seems off; continuous pretraining usually modifies something, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
4 months ago
C is spot on! Fine-tuning really does use labeled data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
4 months ago
I feel like option A is misleading since continuous pretraining doesn't modify all parameters. I need to think more about this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that fine-tuning uses labeled data, so C might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about soft prompting not changing the original parameters. Maybe option D is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
5 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar because it mentions fine-tuning and how it modifies all parameters, which we discussed in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
5 months ago
This question requires a good grasp of the technical details of these fine-tuning methods. I'll need to draw on my knowledge of model parameters and data usage to determine the most accurate statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
5 months ago
Okay, the key is to focus on the number of parameters modified and the type of data used. I'll make sure to compare those factors across the different approaches mentioned in the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the terminology here. I'll need to refresh my understanding of fine-tuning, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, and soft prompting before I can confidently answer this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
6 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the differences between various fine-tuning techniques. I'll carefully review the options and think through the key distinctions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
7 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards C, but I feel like I'm missing something. Maybe I need to ask the professor's parrot for help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
7 months ago
I think D is the correct answer because it mentions no modification to the original parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
7 months ago
D? Really? Soft Prompting and continuous pretraining not modifying any parameters? That's a stretch. I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
6 months ago
I think C is the most accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
6 months ago
I agree, D does seem like a stretch. C makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Earleen
7 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
8 months ago
I'm torn between B and C, but I think C is the better answer. Modifying all parameters with labeled data is a key distinction.
upvoted 0 times
Tyra
6 months ago
C is definitely the most accurate option. It clearly explains the differences in parameter modification and data usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
6 months ago
B is not the right answer because it mentions using unlabeled data, which is not the case for Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
7 months ago
I agree, C is the correct choice. It clearly states the differences in parameter modification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
7 months ago
I think C is the better answer. Modifying all parameters with labeled data is a key distinction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmelina
8 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
8 months ago
Option C seems the most accurate to me. Fine-tuning and Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning do have different parameter modification approaches.
upvoted 0 times
Tammara
8 months ago
It's important to understand the nuances in parameter modification when choosing an approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
8 months ago
Fine-tuning and Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning definitely have different ways of modifying parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
8 months ago
I agree, option C does seem to accurately reflect the differences between the approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel