Discuss OMG OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Exam Topic 9 Question 4

Choose the correct answer:

What is a reason for fUML lo be compact?

AfUML should be small to facilitate definition of a clear semantics.

BfUML must be possible to execute on computers with restricted capacity

CfUML must be easily memorized by those who apply it to make semantics.

DfUML should always support 1-1 mappings from surface to platform languages.

Suggested Answer: A

The reason for fUML to be compact is to facilitate the definition of clear semantics. A smaller, more focused subset of UML allows for a more precise and unambiguous specification of the execution semantics.This clarity is essential for ensuring that models are executed consistently and as intended across different tools and platforms2. The compact nature of fUML helps in achieving this goal by limiting the scope to the essential elements necessary for execution, thereby reducing complexity and potential for misinterpretation.

Get Premium OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

26 comments · newest first

Shanice 10 months ago

1-1 mappings seem too rigid for a flexible language like fUML.

Billi 11 months ago

Surprised that compactness is tied to restricted capacity!

Frank 11 months ago

I think memorization isn’t really a priority though.

Tresa 11 months ago

Totally agree, small is better for execution!

Pearly 11 months ago

fUML needs to be compact for clear semantics.

Keith 12 months ago

I feel like the 1-1 mapping to platform languages is important, but I don't think that's why fUML is compact.

Valene 12 months ago

I vaguely recall something about memorization being important for fUML, but I can't see how that relates to compactness.

Viki 12 months ago

I remember practicing a question about fUML's execution on limited systems. I feel like option B might be correct.

Chantell 1 year ago

I think the compactness of fUML relates to its semantics, but I'm not sure if that's the main reason.

Trina 1 year ago

I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is B. fUML must be possible to execute on computers with restricted capacity. That's the main reason for it being compact, in my opinion.

Telma 1 year ago

The key here is that fUML needs to be executable on computers with restricted capacity. That's why it should be compact - to ensure it can run on a wide range of systems.

Marguerita 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. Is it asking about the reasons for fUML being compact, or something else? I want to make sure I understand it properly before answering.

Stephanie 1 year ago

Okay, I think I know the answer here. fUML should be compact to facilitate a clear definition of its semantics. That makes the most sense to me.

Magda 1 year ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the reasons for fUML being compact. Let me review the options.

Kimbery 1 year ago

This seems like a straightforward question about how incidents are updated when a problem is closed. I'll need to carefully review the details to make sure I understand the different options.

Carlota 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different aspects of distribution planning, but I'm not sure which one is the primary outcome. I'll have to think this through carefully.

Erick 1 year ago

I remember learning that Blockchain is designed to be self-governing, so I think the correct answer is A - the users.

Eveline 2 years ago

I see your point as well. Option D would ensure compatibility between different languages.

Thaddeus 2 years ago

D) fUML should always support 1-1 mappings from surface to platform languages.

Val 2 years ago

That's a good point too. Having a compact fUML would ensure it can run on less powerful computers.

Donette 2 years ago

B) fUML must be possible to execute on computers with restricted capacity.

Eveline 2 years ago

I think option A makes sense because having a compact fUML will make it easier to understand.

Val 2 years ago

A) fUML should be small to facilitate definition of a clear semantics.

Filiberto 2 years ago

D) fUML should always support Maryrose-Maryrose mappings from surface to platform languages.

Viola 2 years ago

B) fUML must be possible to execute on computers with restricted capacity

Maryrose 2 years ago

A) fUML should be small to facilitate definition of a clear semantics.

OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Exam - Topic 9 Question 4 Discussion