MENU
Choose the correct answer:
What characterizes the generalization relationship between two Classifiers where the child can NOT be substituted for the parent?
30 comments · newest first
KE
Keith
10 months ago
B sounds plausible too, but I lean towards C.
WI
Wilbert
11 months ago
A is definitely not it, that's for sure.
MI
Mitzie
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off.
MA
Marge
11 months ago
Totally agree with you, that's the right one!
GL
Glory
11 months ago
I think it's C, 'isSubstitutable' set to false.
CA
Carissa
12 months ago
I vaguely recall something about 'nonSubstitutable' being a stereotype, so A could be correct, but I need to double-check that.
LA
Lamonica
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused; I thought the property 'Substitute' was related to this concept. Maybe B is the right choice?
JE
Jenelle
12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we discussed substitutability in classifiers. I feel like A could be a strong contender here.
FL
Floyd
1 year ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure about the terminology used in the question.
HA
Halina
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer here. It's B - the relationship has the property 'Substitute' set to false.
AS
Ashlyn
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Can someone explain the difference between the options a bit more?
AL
Albert
1 year ago
Alright, I've got this. The correct answer is C - it has the property 'isSubstitutable' set to false.
JE
Jessenia
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is understanding the concept of non-substitutability between a parent and child classifier. I'll review my notes on that.
AL
Alison
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the relationship between classifiers and substitutability.
JU
Julieta
1 year ago
Substitutability, the bane of every software architect's existence. At least this question isn't asking about the Observer pattern - now that's a real headache!
CH
Chaya
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old question of substitutability. I'd say C is the way to go, unless the exam question is trying to trick us. Better not to overthink it.
MA
Marilynn
1 year ago
Let's go with C then, better safe than sorry.
GI
Gilma
1 year ago
I agree, C seems like the most logical choice.
LY
Lynsey
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer.
KI
Kiley
1 year ago
D sounds like it could be right, but 'substitutingClassifier' seems a bit off. I'm going to go with C, it just feels more intuitive.
RI
Rickie
1 year ago
C) It has the property 'isSubstitutable' set to false.
SE
Selma
1 year ago
B) It has the property 'Substitute' set to false.
SE
Selene
1 year ago
A) It has the stereotype 'nonSubstitutable'.
LA
Larae
1 year ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards B, but I can see the logic behind C as well. This question is really testing our understanding of UML relationships.
CL
Claudia
1 year ago
C) It has the property 'isSubstitutable' set to false.
MA
Marlon
1 year ago
A) It has the stereotype 'nonSubstitutable'.
TE
Tennie
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think Caprice might be right. It makes sense that the property 'isSubstitutable' would be set to false in this case.
SH
Shenika
2 years ago
I think it's C. The property 'isSubstitutable' being set to false would indicate that the child can't be substituted for the parent. Seems pretty straightforward to me.
CA
Caprice
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) It has the property 'isSubstitutable' set to false.
GE
Geoffrey
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) It has the stereotype 'nonSubstitutable'.