U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Exam - Topic 1 Question 22 Discussion

Choose the correct answerHow is a testCase used to validate a requirement?
B) Validation of a requirement can be indicated using a satisfiedBy relationship to a testCase
A) The testCase model element can be used in SystvIL but it only applies to software
C) Only the verdict model element (which can be a property of a testCase) can have a verifies relationship to a requirement.
D) A requirement can have a vehfiedBy relationship to a testCase even if the test has not yet been conducted or even fully specified
E) testCase is part of the UML Testing Profile and cannot be used with SysML.

OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Exam - Topic 1 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 1
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Questions]

Choose the correct answer

How is a testCase used to validate a requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Whitney
8 months ago
I had no idea about the satisfiedBy relationship, that's interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
8 months ago
A is just wrong; testCases are used in more than just software!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
8 months ago
Wait, D seems a bit off to me. How can it be verified if not tested?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
8 months ago
I think C makes more sense, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
8 months ago
B is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
9 months ago
I vaguely remember something about requirements being verified by testCases, even if they aren't fully specified yet. Is that right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
9 months ago
I feel like the verifies relationship is important, but I can't recall if it's only for verdicts or if it applies to testCases too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
9 months ago
I think the satisfiedBy relationship is key for indicating validation, but I might be mixing it up with something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
9 months ago
I remember that a testCase can be linked to requirements, but I'm not sure about the specific relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
9 months ago
Okay, this looks like a question about the specific features and capabilities of user roles in AruDaOS. I'll need to draw on my understanding of network access control and policy enforcement to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
9 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the requirements and the solution provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with B. The other options just sound like they're trying to trip you up with technicalities. Keep it simple, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 year ago
E is just silly. Of course testCase is part of the UML Testing Profile, but that doesn't mean it can't be used with SysML. These answer options are all over the place!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
1 year ago
A is clearly wrong. The testCase model element is not just for software - it's part of the SysML testing profile and can be used to validate any kind of system requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Krystal
1 year ago
E) testCase is part of the UML Testing Profile and cannot be used with SysML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 year ago
D) A requirement can have a verifiedBy relationship to a testCase even if the test has not yet been conducted or even fully specified
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
B) Validation of a requirement can be indicated using a satisfiedBy relationship to a testCase
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamera
1 year ago
I'm not sure about D. Can a requirement really be 'verified' by a testCase that hasn't even been fully specified yet? Seems a bit sketchy to me.
upvoted 0 times
Gabriele
1 year ago
User3: I'm not convinced. It does seem a bit risky to verify a requirement with an incomplete testCase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
1 year ago
User2: I agree with User1. It's possible to have a verifiedBy relationship before the test is conducted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 year ago
User1: I think D is correct. A requirement can be verified by a testCase even if the test hasn't been fully specified yet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) A requirement can have a verifiedBy relationship to a testCase even if the test has not yet been conducted or fully specified could also be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
1 year ago
B is definitely the correct answer. The 'satisfiedBy' relationship between a requirement and a testCase is the way to indicate that the requirement has been validated.
upvoted 0 times
Raina
1 year ago
Yes, B is the right choice. It clearly indicates how a requirement can be validated through the satisfiedBy relationship with a testCase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
1 year ago
I agree, B is the correct answer. It shows the validation of a requirement using a satisfiedBy relationship to a testCase.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanda
1 year ago
I agree with Candida, option B makes sense because it shows the relationship between the requirement and the testCase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is B) Validation of a requirement can be indicated using a satisfiedBy relationship to a testCase.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel