Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Topic 3 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 3
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions]

Choose the correct answer

The lead systems engineer on a project has identified a set of Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) that need to be evaluated both on a periodic basis during development, and during acceptance for every design change. Many of these KPPs are expressed In complex, interrelated differential equations The analysis team has identified appropriate numerical techniques for solving these equations and expressed them in a popular analysis tool.

The lead system modeler and methodologist must ensure that the architecture and design captured in the SysML system model are continuously and accurately reflected In the KPP calculations.

Which strategy is likely to be most successful in accomplishing this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Van
23 days ago
Wait, we're supposed to solve differential equations in SysML now? I thought this was a systems engineering exam, not a math competition. Option C is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
27 days ago
Haha, I'm just picturing the analysis team trying to solve those differential equations with a spreadsheet. Option C is definitely the way to go, although I do like the idea of using a spreadsheet as a backup plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
29 days ago
Option D with the code generation capability sounds really interesting, but I'm not sure how well it would scale for complex, interrelated differential equations. C seems like a more versatile and manageable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
1 months ago
I like the idea of using a spreadsheet to manage the KPP parameters, but relying on manual updates to the spreadsheet from the SysML model could introduce errors. Option C seems like a more automated and reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Venita
1 days ago
I agree, partitioning the KPP evaluation model into manageable subroutines and using constraint blocks in SysML sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
16 days ago
Option C does seem like a more automated and reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christoper
2 months ago
I see your points, but I personally think option D is the way to go as it accurately models the flow of data to solve the KPP evaluation equations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more successful as it partitions the KPP evaluation model into manageable subroutines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
Option C seems like the most robust and flexible approach. Partitioning the KPP evaluation model into reusable subroutines and linking them to the SysML model through constraint blocks is a great way to maintain consistency and traceability.
upvoted 0 times
Verlene
4 days ago
It's important to have a method that allows for easy updates and traceability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
6 days ago
Using constraint blocks to tie the KPP evaluation directly to the system model is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
12 days ago
It definitely seems like the best way to ensure consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
26 days ago
I agree, option C does seem like a robust approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Penney
2 months ago
I think option A is the best strategy because it ensures consistency by keeping all information in the same model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
2 months ago
I see your points, but I personally think option D is the way to go. Using activity and state models to accurately model the flow of data seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more successful as it partitions the KPP evaluation model into manageable subroutines for easier management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
2 months ago
I think option A is the best strategy because it ensures consistency by keeping all information in the same model.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel