Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Exam - Topic 1 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 1
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions]

Choose the correct answer.

Given the following diagram fragment:

Which criterion indicates that a decision node construct such as this is well-formed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Emelda at Jan 14, 2025, 10:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Truman
5 months ago
Not sure about B, what if the guards aren't truly exclusive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
5 months ago
C is important, but I agree with B being the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
5 months ago
Surprised that D is even an option, it seems too vague!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
6 months ago
I think A makes sense too, but B feels more complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
6 months ago
B is definitely the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
6 months ago
Option D seems like it could be relevant, but I’m not sure if understandability is a formal criterion for well-formed decision nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m not confident. I feel like I’ve seen something similar in our study materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
6 months ago
I remember practicing a question about guard conditions, and I feel like option C might be important too, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
7 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because it relates to how decision nodes should be structured, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the only criterion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
7 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The correct answer is B - the guards need to cover all possibilities and be mutually exclusive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. I'll need to re-read the question and think through each choice carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
7 months ago
Okay, I got this. The guards can't negate the corresponding activities, and they have to be evaluable without changing the state. That's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
7 months ago
Hmm, the guards need to cover all possibilities and be mutually exclusive, right? I think that's the key to this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
7 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully review the diagram and the answer choices to make sure I understand the criteria for a well-formed decision node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
11 months ago
Ah, the age-old question: are the guards mutually exclusive, or is the developer just a mutual exclusion?
upvoted 0 times
Alberta
10 months ago
D) The guards are understandable by stakeholders in the development effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
11 months ago
C) Each guard legal can be evaluated without changing the state of any item referenced by the corresponding activity or action Ai
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
11 months ago
B) Taken together, the guards cover all possibilities and are mutually exclusive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
11 months ago
A) No activity Ai will negate the corresponding guard [gi]
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anika
12 months ago
I don't know, guys. What if the guards are written in Klingon? Shouldn't that be an option too?
upvoted 0 times
Narcisa
10 months ago
C) Each guard legal can be evaluated without changing the state of any item referenced by the corresponding activity or action Ai
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
10 months ago
B) Taken together, the guards cover all possibilities and are mutually exclusive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
11 months ago
A) No activity Ai will negate the corresponding guard [gi]
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jannette
12 months ago
Understandable by stakeholders? Pfft, have you met some of the stakeholders I've worked with? I'm sticking with B.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
11 months ago
User 3: B it is then, let's go with the safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, stakeholders can be a handful sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
12 months ago
User 1: I agree, B seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlena
1 year ago
Hold up, are we sure the guards are even supposed to be readable? I'm going with C, keeping that state intact is the real priority.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
11 months ago
I see your point, but I still think C is the best option for maintaining the state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
11 months ago
But what about D? Shouldn't the guards be understandable by stakeholders?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe C is the right choice to ensure the state remains unchanged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
12 months ago
I think B is the correct answer, the guards need to cover all possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
1 year ago
Option B seems like the obvious choice here. The guards need to cover all possible scenarios without any overlaps.
upvoted 0 times
Rosina
12 months ago
Yes, option B is the best choice. It ensures that the decision node is well-formed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
12 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct choice. The guards must cover all possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zona
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think C could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
1 year ago
I agree with Eden, because the guards need to cover all possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel