Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

OMG Exam OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions]

Choose the correct answer

A system engineer designing a smart-home system is working with three analysts using specialized computational tools to evaluate energy consumption, waste production, and reliability of the system The team is soliciting a recommendation for an approach that achieves the following

(1) Analysis models should Incorporate design details necessary for evaluation

(2) Analysis models should be easily adaptable for different types of smart-home systems

Which recommendation would be most effective from a MBSE perspective'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, A

This recommendation would be most effective from a MBSE perspective because it allows the system engineer and the analysts to leverage the SysML model as a source of design information and analysis input. A SysML model is a graphical and textual representation of a system and its structure, behavior, requirements, etc. By creating a SysML model for capturing the design of different types of smart-home systems, the system engineer can specify the relevant design details necessary for evaluation, such as parameters, constraints, properties, etc. The analysts can then set up executable templates/scripts to generate analysis models from the SysML model using various methods and tools. This way, the analysts can ensure that their analysis models incorporate the latest design information and are easily adaptable for different types of smart-home systems. The system engineer and the analysts can also use allocation or synchronization mechanisms to link the SysML model and the analysis models and propagate changes between them. Reference: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://sysml.org/tutorials/sysml-diagram-tutorial/


by Peggie at Aug 25, 2024, 04:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rolande
10 months ago
Option D is the way to go, no doubt. Gotta love that MBSE goodness. Although, I'm curious to see what kind of wacky smart-home systems these analysts are evaluating. Bet they've got some fun stories to share!
upvoted 0 times
Angella
9 months ago
I wonder what kind of smart-home systems these analysts are working on. Must be interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
9 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like the most effective recommendation from a MBSE perspective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
10 months ago
Option D is the way to go, no doubt. Gotta love that MBSE goodness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
10 months ago
I think option D could also work well, with the dependency relations between design specifications and analysis packages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
10 months ago
I prefer option B, as it focuses on high-level design specifications which can be consulted by analysts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
10 months ago
Haha, leave it to the system engineers to come up with an overly complex solution. I'd just go with option B - keep it simple and let the analysts do their thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
10 months ago
I agree with Reynalda, option A seems to be the most effective from a MBSE perspective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
10 months ago
I think option A sounds like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
10 months ago
I agree, D is the way to go. The dependency relations between the design and the analysis models is key for ensuring the evaluation criteria are directly tied to the system design.
upvoted 0 times
Carrol
9 months ago
Yes, D is the way to go. The dependency relations will help maintain consistency between the design and analysis models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
9 months ago
Agreed, D seems like the most logical approach. It establishes a direct link between the design details and the evaluation criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
9 months ago
I think D is the most effective choice too. It ensures a clear connection between the design specifications and the analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
9 months ago
D is definitely the best option. The dependency relations are crucial for linking the design and analysis models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
10 months ago
I think D is the most effective choice too. It's important to have that direct link between design and analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
10 months ago
D is definitely the best option. The dependency relations will make sure everything is connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joseph
11 months ago
Option D seems like the most comprehensive approach. Having a central SysML model that links the design specifications to the different analysis packages would definitely help with maintaining consistency and adaptability.
upvoted 0 times
Noel
10 months ago
I agree, having a central SysML model linking design specifications to analysis packages would be very helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
10 months ago
Option D seems like the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel