A mission-critical VM utilizing an NVIDIA vGPU profile for high-end graphical processing is replicated from a primary Nutanix cluster to a secondary disaster recovery site. After failover of a VM using an NVIDIA vGPU profile, the VM boots but hardware acceleration does not function.
What action is required?
An administrator migrates a guest VM from a legacy Protection Domain--based DR configuration to a Prism Central (PC)--based Protection Policy. Immediately after migration, the administrator considers deleting the legacy Protection Domain snapshots to reclaim storage.
According to Nutanix guidance, when is it safe to delete the legacy Protection Domain snapshots?
An administrator is concerned about the operational overhead of manually creating and managing categories across both the primary and recovery sites to ensure Recovery Plans function correctly during failover and failback.
What Nutanix Disaster Recovery behavior minimizes this concern?
An administrator finds replications for Marketing VMs are failing to replicate. After doing some digging the administrator was able to find the following:
Connectivity was confirmed on ports 2020 and 2009 between the clusters
All other VMs are replicating successfully
Cluster wide storage has plenty of remaining space
No firewall exists between the sites
Marketing VMs are running Windows, successful VMs are running Linux
What could be causing the Marketing VMs to fail replications?
An administrator wants to run a test failover and maps the primary production virtual network to the recovery site production virtual network for the test.
What are the two most likely outcomes? (Choose two.)
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!