MENU
[Configure and Utilize Nutanix Unified Storage]
Which setting is recommended when hardening a Nutanix Objects bucket with sensitive data?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium NCP-US Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
OR
Ora
6 months ago
WORM is definitely the way to go for protecting sensitive buckets!
KA
Kayleigh
6 months ago
I feel like Erasure Coding is important, but not for hardening.
CH
Chantay
6 months ago
KMIP could be useful too, but WORM is more secure for this case.
AN
Annabelle
7 months ago
Agreed! WORM ensures data integrity for sensitive info.
NO
Novella
7 months ago
I think WORM is the best choice. It prevents data from being altered.
KA
Kaycee
7 months ago
Erasure Coding is cool, but not for hardening sensitive data.
EL
Elden
8 months ago
I thought KMIP was more important for encryption though?
KR
Kristel
8 months ago
Totally agree, WORM adds that extra layer of protection.
DE
Dexter
8 months ago
A) WORM is the way to go for sensitive data!
HO
Horace
8 months ago
Hardening a bucket with sensitive data? Better use KMIP, or else the data might end up like my high school diary - in the wrong hands!
VA
Val
8 months ago
A) WORM could work, but KMIP is probably the more comprehensive security solution for this scenario.
SU
Sue
8 months ago
B) HTTP? Really? That's the least secure option for sensitive data. Definitely not the right answer.
XU
Xuan
9 months ago
D) Erasure Coding seems like the right choice to me. It provides better data protection than the other options.
WI
Wilburn
9 months ago
HTTP seems too basic for hardening sensitive data, but I can't remember the specifics of why that is.
MA
Marjory
9 months ago
I feel like Erasure Coding is more about data redundancy than security, so I don't think that's the answer here.
MA
Malcolm
9 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think KMIP was mentioned in the context of encryption, but I can't recall if it's the best for hardening.
JO
Joanna
9 months ago
I think WORM might be the right choice since it prevents data from being modified, but I'm not entirely sure.
RE
Rene
9 months ago
Ah, I remember this from the course. The answer is C) KMIP. That's the recommended setting for hardening Nutanix Objects buckets with sensitive information.
NG
Ngoc
10 months ago
I think the answer is C) KMIP. That's the best way to secure sensitive data in a Nutanix Objects bucket.
RO
Rolande
10 months ago
I've worked with Nutanix Objects before, and I think the KMIP key management integration would be the recommended approach for sensitive data. That provides the strongest encryption and access control.
KR
Kristel
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between the options here. I'll need to review my Nutanix Objects notes to figure out which one is the best hardening setting for sensitive data.
CA
Candida
10 months ago
HTTP doesn’t provide enough security for sensitive data.
HO
Honey
10 months ago
Really? WORM? I’m surprised that’s the top choice!
EV
Evan
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know WORM is for write-once-read-many data, so that could be a good option for sensitive info. But I'm not sure if that's the "recommended" setting.
KA
Kanisha
11 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the Nutanix Objects security features carefully.
RE
Reynalda
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards Erasure Coding for redundancy.
BR
Brinda
5 months ago
True, but WORM is specifically for data retention.
RE
Rebbecca
6 months ago
What about KMIP? Isn't that important for key management?
CH
Cherelle
6 months ago
Agreed, it adds an extra layer of protection.
ME
Melvin
6 months ago
I think WORM is the best choice for sensitive data.