Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-US Exam - Topic 6 Question 65 Discussion

Posted by Afton on May 11, 2026 at 05:17 AM

[Configure and Utilize Nutanix Unified Storage]

An administrator has recently added several NGT-enabled VMs with in-guest iSCSI initiators to a Volume Group (VG) using IP addresses in the VG allowlist. Several days later, the administrator restored the VG, after which the VMs lost connectivity to the Volume Group.

What should the administrator have done differently to prevent this from happening?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium NCP-US Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
22 comments · newest first
CH
Christiane 2 days ago
Agreed, it’s more reliable for iSCSI connections.
AN
An 7 days ago
I think using the iSCSI IQN is the best option.
DE
Deeanna 12 days ago
I feel like B is safer for long-term stability.
TI
Timothy 18 days ago
A covers all bases. IQN is standard practice.
VI
Vicente 23 days ago
D is too specific. MAC addresses can change too.
EV
Eveline 28 days ago
C seems risky. Hostnames can change.
YU
Yuonne 1 month ago
I agree, but B could work too. VM UUID is unique.
RE
Rebecka 1 month ago
I think option A is the best choice. IQN is crucial for iSCSI.
LA
Lashunda 1 month ago
I thought IP addresses were enough, guess I was wrong!
DE
Delpha 2 months ago
Using MAC addresses is a solid option too, just saying.
DO
Dorian 2 months ago
Wait, can you really use VM UUIDs for this? Sounds odd.
RI
Rickie 2 months ago
Totally agree, that makes the most sense!
AR
Art 2 months ago
Should've used the iSCSI IQN in the allowlist.
RO
Roselle 2 months ago
Using hostnames could lead to issues if they change.
SA
Sabine 2 months ago
I think MAC addresses are a better option here.
AU
Audra 3 months ago
Wait, can you really use VM UUIDs for this? Sounds odd.
TE
Tequila 3 months ago
Totally agree, that makes the most sense!
RO
Rocco 3 months ago
Should've used the iSCSI IQN in the allowlist.
CR
Crissy 3 months ago
I vaguely recall something about MAC addresses being less reliable for this kind of configuration. I wonder if the IQN is really the best practice here.
VE
Verdell 3 months ago
I feel like using the VM hostname could lead to issues if the hostname changes, so I'm leaning towards the iSCSI IQN option.
TR
Tracey 4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the VM UUID could also work since it uniquely identifies the VM. It might have been mentioned in one of the practice questions we did.
LA
Lavonne 5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using the correct identifiers in the allowlist during our practice sessions. I think using the iSCSI IQN might be the right choice here.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel