Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-MCI-6.10 Topic 2 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCI-6.10 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 2
[All NCP-MCI-6.10 Questions]

An administrator is protecting an application and its data stored on Volume Groups using Protection Domains.

During failover tests, all application VMs restore successfully, but the application data is completely missing.

How can the Protection Domain configuration be adjusted to avoid this issue in the future? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Protection Domains (PDs) in Nutanix ensure that entire applications and their associated data are protected during failover. However, Volume Groups (VGs) are not automatically included unless explicitly configured.

Option A (Select 'Auto protect related entities') is correct:

This setting ensures that associated Volume Groups, networks, and other dependencies are included in the Protection Domain automatically.

Without enabling this, only the VM itself would be protected, leading to missing application data upon failover.

Option B (Manually add Volume Groups to Protected Entities) is correct:

If 'Auto protect related entities' is not enabled, the administrator must manually add Volume Groups to the Protection Domain.

This ensures that both VMs and their attached Volume Groups are replicated and recovered together.

Option C (Place Volume Groups in a separate Protection Domain) is incorrect:

Separating Volume Groups into a different PD does not guarantee they failover together with VMs.

It is best practice to keep related VMs and Volume Groups in the same PD.

Option D (Use application-consistent snapshots) is incorrect:

While application-consistent snapshots improve data integrity, they do not fix missing Volume Groups in failover scenarios.


Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide Protection Domain Configuration and Volume Groups

Nutanix KB Ensuring Volume Groups Are Included in Disaster Recovery Failovers

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marshall
2 months ago
I think placing Volume Groups in a separate Protection Domain could also help avoid this issue in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
2 months ago
I believe we should also use application-consistent snapshots to ensure data is not missing during failover tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
2 months ago
I agree with Major. That way, all related entities will be protected automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
2 months ago
I bet the admin was so focused on protecting the VMs, they forgot the actual data. Gotta remember the whole package, not just the wrapping!
upvoted 0 times
Huey
21 days ago
C) Place Volume Groups in a separate Protection Domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 months ago
A) Select the 'Auto protect related entities' checkbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Major
2 months ago
I think we should select the 'Auto protect related entities' checkbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
2 months ago
Ooh, using application-consistent snapshots sounds like a good idea. That way, the data and the VMs are all protected together.
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
5 days ago
Placing Volume Groups in a separate Protection Domain might be another way to prevent this issue in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
8 days ago
Manually adding Volume Groups to Protected Entities could also help avoid missing data during failover tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
13 days ago
We could also select the 'Auto protect related entities' checkbox to ensure everything is protected together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
30 days ago
Yes, using application-consistent snapshots is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
1 months ago
Tammy: Good idea, that should help avoid missing data during failover tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
1 months ago
Alesia: We could also use application-consistent snapshots for added protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that way everything is protected together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should select the 'Auto protect related entities' checkbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meghann
2 months ago
Haha, maybe the admin forgot to check the 'Auto protect related entities' box. Rookie mistake, but an easy fix!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the key is to make sure the Volume Groups are explicitly included in the Protection Domain. Manually adding them seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
1 months ago
Using application-consistent snapshots is another good option to consider for avoiding missing data during failover tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 months ago
I think selecting the 'Auto protect related entities' checkbox could also help prevent data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
1 months ago
I agree, manually adding Volume Groups to Protected Entities is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adolph
2 months ago
Ugh, this is so frustrating. How can the data be missing when the VMs restore successfully? It's like the Protection Domain is protecting everything except the actual data!
upvoted 0 times
Reta
2 months ago
I know, it's frustrating. Maybe we need to adjust the Protection Domain configuration to include the data as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
2 months ago
C) Place Volume Groups in a separate Protection Domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
A) Select the 'Auto protect related entities' checkbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel