An administrator wants to ensure that VMs can be migrated and restarted on another node in the event of a single-host failure.
What action should be taken in Prism Element to meet this requirement?
To ensure VM high availability (HA) in the event of a node failure, the administrator must enable HA Reservation (Option B) in Prism Element.
High Availability (HA) in Nutanix ensures that VMs restart on another available node if the host they are running on fails.
Option A (Redundancy Factor 3) affects storage redundancy, not VM failover.
Option C (Protection Domains) is related to disaster recovery (DR), not local HA failover.
Option D (RF1 Storage Container) would reduce fault tolerance and is not recommended for production environments.
References:
Nutanix Prism Element Guide Configuring HA Reservation
Nutanix Bible High Availability (HA) and Failover
Nutanix Support KB VM Recovery with HA Enabled
An administrator would like to plan for new project-related growth.
New project workload requirements have been included for a cluster named ClusterXYZ:
* 2 Medium Sized SQL Servers
* 10 VMs with 16Gb RAM, 4 vCPU, 100GB Storage
Which two additional information items should be added to the capacity planning scenario to provide a proper capacity runway expectation? (Choose two.)
A company is evaluating Nutanix Disaster Recovery (DR) to protect multiple business-critical applications. Some applications are built using a 3-tier architecture and have interdependencies.
After failover, the VM's static IP address is retained, but DNS configuration is lost.
How should an administrator proceed to resolve this issue?
During failover in Nutanix Disaster Recovery, VMs retain their static IPs but may lose DNS settings if the network configuration at the DR site is different from the primary site.
Option B (Create custom in-guest scripts) is correct:
Custom scripts allow Windows or Linux VMs to restore DNS settings automatically after failover.
These scripts can be executed using post-failover automation in Nutanix DR policies.
Option A (Self-Service Restore) is incorrect:
Self-Service Restore is used for end-user recovery of deleted files, not for network settings.
Option C (nncli tool) is incorrect:
The nncli tool is used for network troubleshooting, but it does not automatically restore DNS settings.
Option D (Configure a Protection Domain) is incorrect:
Protection Domains define replication policies, but they do not fix DNS settings after failover.
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide Failover Automation and Network Configuration
Nutanix Bible VM Recovery and IP Management in DR Scenarios
Nutanix KB Preserving DNS Settings in Disaster Recovery
An administrator needs to create a single chart showing multiple storage bandwidth metrics a VM is consuming.
Which type of chart should the administrator create?
Entity Charts in Nutanix Prism Central allow multiple metrics from a single entity (e.g., VM, storage container) to be displayed on a single graph.
Option B (Entity Chart) is correct:
This allows the administrator to track multiple performance metrics (e.g., read/write bandwidth, IOPS) for a specific VM.
Option A (Metric Chart) is incorrect:
Metric Charts track a single metric across multiple entities, which does not meet the requirement of displaying multiple metrics for a single VM.
Option C (Hypervisor Performance Chart) is incorrect:
Hypervisor Performance Charts track host-level metrics, not VM-specific bandwidth metrics.
Option D (VM Summary Chart) is incorrect:
VM Summary Charts only provide an overview and do not support custom multi-metric tracking.
Nutanix Prism Central Guide Entity vs. Metric Charts for Performance Analysis
Nutanix KB Creating Custom Charts in Prism Central
The customer expects to maintain a cluster runway of 9 months. The customer doesn't have a budget for 6 months but they want to add new workloads to the existing cluster.
Based on the exhibit, what is required to meet the customer's budgetary timeframe?
The exhibit shows that the overall runway is only 66 days, meaning that the current cluster does not have enough capacity to sustain workloads for 6 months, let alone 9 months.
The best solution is to add resources to the cluster (Option A), such as CPU, memory, or storage, to extend the runway.
Postponing new workloads (Option B) may help in the short term but does not align with the business need to continue adding workloads.
Deleting workloads (Option C) is not a viable option because the customer wants to add more, not remove them.
Changing the target to 9 months (Option D) does not change the actual resource constraints; it only alters the target timeframe.
Nutanix Prism Central Capacity Planning and Runway Analysis
Nutanix Bible Cluster Resource Management and Scaling
Nutanix Support KB How to Extend Cluster Runway with Resource Scaling
Teresita
11 days agoCurt
23 days agoMargo
25 days agoHui
2 months agoThomasena
2 months agoLeslie
3 months agoSolange
3 months agoKeneth
4 months agoDulce
4 months agoAntonio
4 months ago